The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelines
Authors: Thilo Hagendorff
AI-generated Key Points
- Rapid development and application of AI systems have sparked a widespread discourse on AI ethics
- Numerous ethics guidelines have been released to regulate the use of these technologies
- Thilo Hagendorff's paper titled "The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelines" provides a comprehensive evaluation of these guidelines, analyzing and comparing them to highlight overlaps and omissions
- The paper aims to give readers a detailed overview of the field of AI ethics while examining how ethical principles and values are implemented in the practice of research, development, and application of AI systems
- Hagendorff explores ways in which the effectiveness in meeting the demands of AI ethics can be improved
- This analysis is crucial given the potential disruptive nature of new AI technologies and their impact on society at large
- The paper provides insight into how ethical considerations can be addressed more effectively when developing and applying AI systems
- Overall, this paper serves as an essential resource for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners seeking guidance on ethical considerations related to AI systems.
Abstract: Current advances in research, development and application of artificial intelligence (AI) systems have yielded a far-reaching discourse on AI ethics. In consequence, a number of ethics guidelines have been released in recent years. These guidelines comprise normative principles and recommendations aimed to harness the "disruptive" potentials of new AI technologies. Designed as a comprehensive evaluation, this paper analyzes and compares these guidelines highlighting overlaps but also omissions. As a result, I give a detailed overview of the field of AI ethics. Finally, I also examine to what extent the respective ethical principles and values are implemented in the practice of research, development and application of AI systems - and how the effectiveness in the demands of AI ethics can be improved.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.