AI summary · arXiv: 1808.06575v2 · hep-ex

Search for a charged Higgs boson decaying to charm and bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 8 TeV

CMS Collaboration

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 20 Aug. 2018 JHEP 11 (2018) 115 Replaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-16-030 (CMS Public Pages) License: CC BY 4.0

The essentials

  • CMS Collaboration investigated t$\overline{\mathrm{t}}$ pair production in search for charged Higgs boson decaying to charm and bottom quarks (H$^+\to$c$\overline{\mathrm{b}}$)
  • Used 19.7 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 8 TeV
  • Study focused on events with at least four jets, a charged lepton, and missing transverse momentum
  • Kinematic fit performed to distinguish jets from top quark decays vs. those associated with charged Higgs boson decay
  • No evidence found for presence of charged Higgs boson in the data
  • Upper limits set on branching fraction $\mathcal{B}$(t $\to$ H$^+$b) between 0.8-0.5%
  • Limits established for charged Higgs boson masses ranging from 90 GeV to 150 GeV
  • Analysis provides insights into search for exotic particles at CERN's Large Hadron Collider

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Charged Higgs boson

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
, , , , The CMS Collaboration investigated the production mechanism of t$\overline{\mathrm{t}}$ pair production in a search for a charged Higgs boson decaying to charm and bottom quarks (H$^+\to$c$\overline{\mathrm{b}}$) using 19.7 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 8 TeV. The study focused on identifying events with at least four jets, a charged lepton (muon or electron), and missing transverse momentum as signatures of the decay process. A kinematic fit was performed to distinguish between jets likely originating from direct top quark decays and those potentially associated with the decay of the charged Higgs boson. However, no evidence for the presence of a charged Higgs boson was found in the data. Upper limits at 95% confidence level were set on the branching fraction $\mathcal{B}$(t $\to$ H$^+$b) in the range of 0.8-0.5%, assuming $\mathcal{B}$(H$^+\to$c$\overline{\mathrm{b}}) =$1.0 and conservation of total branching fractions for top quark decays. These limits were established for charged Higgs boson masses ranging from 90 GeV to 150 GeV. Figure 2 illustrates post-fit dijet mass distributions from standard model backgrounds compared with expected signal yields for different scenarios involving varying numbers of b-tagged jets and different charged Higgs boson masses (MH+). This analysis provides valuable insights into the search for exotic particles in high-energy collisions at CERN's Large Hadron Collider facility.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
Talk about it in public Premium+ Press kit: release, questions, hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.