A Robust AUC Maximization Framework with Simultaneous Outlier Detection and Feature Selection for Positive-Unlabeled Classification
Authors: Ke Ren, Haichuan Yang, Yu Zhao, Mingshan Xue, Hongyu Miao, Shuai Huang, Ji Liu
AI-generated Key Points
- Positive-Unlabeled (PU) classification is common in real-world applications like healthcare, text classification, and bioinformatics
- In PU classification, there are few labeled positive samples and a large volume of unlabeled samples that may contain both positive and negative samples
- The authors propose a robust learning framework for the PU problem that combines AUC maximization, outlier detection, and feature selection
- AUC maximization helps handle imbalanced data effectively
- Outlier detection improves the accuracy of the model by excluding wrong labels from training
- Feature selection aims to identify and exclude corrupted features that negatively impact classification performance
- The proposed model provides generalization error bounds and practical guidance for training
- Empirical comparisons on surgical site infection (SSI) and EEG seizure detection show that the proposed model outperforms existing methods
- This research presents a comprehensive framework for addressing the challenges of PU classification in healthcare and bioinformatics.
Abstract: The positive-unlabeled (PU) classification is a common scenario in real-world applications such as healthcare, text classification, and bioinformatics, in which we only observe a few samples labeled as "positive" together with a large volume of "unlabeled" samples that may contain both positive and negative samples. Building robust classifier for the PU problem is very challenging, especially for complex data where the negative samples overwhelm and mislabeled samples or corrupted features exist. To address these three issues, we propose a robust learning framework that unifies AUC maximization (a robust metric for biased labels), outlier detection (for excluding wrong labels), and feature selection (for excluding corrupted features). The generalization error bounds are provided for the proposed model that give valuable insight into the theoretical performance of the method and lead to useful practical guidance, e.g., to train a model, we find that the included unlabeled samples are sufficient as long as the sample size is comparable to the number of positive samples in the training process. Empirical comparisons and two real-world applications on surgical site infection (SSI) and EEG seizure detection are also conducted to show the effectiveness of the proposed model.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.