AI summary · arXiv: 1712.08129v1 · cs.NI

Fault Localization in Large-Scale Network Policy Deployment

Praveen Tammana, Chandra Nagarajan, Pavan Mamillapalli, Ramana Rao Kompella, Myungjin Lee

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 21 Dec. 2017 10 pages, 10 figures, IEEE format, Conference, SDN, Network Policy License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Recent advancements in network management automation and Software-Defined Networking (SDN) simplify network policy management tasks
  • Network policies are represented in an abstract model at a centralized controller and deployed as low-level rules across various network devices
  • Any software or hardware component within this cycle can cause underlying network issues
  • The paper titled "Fault Localization in Large-Scale Network Policy Deployment" addresses the problem of network policy fault localization
  • The authors propose a solution through risk modeling and a greedy algorithm to identify faulty policy objects within the network policy
  • They design and develop SCOUT, a fully automated system that identifies faulty policy objects and pinpoints physical-level failures that caused them
  • Evaluation of SCOUT involves real testbed experiments and extensive simulations, demonstrating its ability to detect faulty objects with minimal false positives and false negatives
  • This research highlights the importance of addressing fault localization in large-scale network policy deployment
  • The authors contribute to improving the reliability and performance of network management frameworks.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Fault Localization

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The recent advancements in network management automation and Software-Defined Networking (SDN) have greatly simplified network policy management tasks. However, these new technologies also introduce a new mode of failure within the management cycle itself. Network policies are represented in an abstract model at a centralized controller and then deployed as low-level rules across various network devices. As a result, any software or hardware component within this cycle has the potential to cause underlying network issues. In this paper titled "Fault Localization in Large-Scale Network Policy Deployment," authors Praveen Tammana, Chandra Nagarajan, Pavan Mamillapalli, Ramana Rao Kompella, and Myungjin Lee address the problem of network policy fault localization that arises in operating policy management frameworks for production networks. They propose a solution by formulating the problem through risk modeling and introducing a greedy algorithm that efficiently identifies faulty policy objects within the network policy. To further enhance their solution, the authors design and develop SCOUT, a fully-automated system that not only identifies faulty policy objects but also pinpoints physical-level failures that caused these objects to become faulty. The evaluation of SCOUT involves real testbed experiments and extensive simulations, which demonstrate its ability to detect faulty objects with minimal false positives and false negatives. Overall, this research highlights the importance of addressing fault localization in large-scale network policy deployment. By presenting an effective solution through risk modeling and algorithmic techniques, the authors contribute to improving the reliability and performance of network management frameworks.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.