Gravitational wave searches for ultralight bosons with LIGO and LISA
Authors: Richard Brito, Shrobana Ghosh, Enrico Barausse, Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, Irina Dvorkin, Antoine Klein, Paolo Pani
AI-generated Key Points
- Brito et al. study the detection of ultralight bosons through gravitational wave observations using LIGO and LISA detectors.
- They focus on superradiant instabilities in spinning black holes, where bosons extract rotational energy, forming a bosonic condensate with distinct signatures like monochromatic gravitational wave emissions.
- Analysis aims to detect or constrain scalar fields with masses from $10^{-19}$ eV to $10^{-11}$ eV for LIGO and $10^{-14}$ eV to $10^{-11}$ eV for LISA.
- Findings suggest potential stochastic background observation by LIGO within mass range of $2 \times 10^{-13}$ eV to $10^{-12}$ eV, with up to approximately 10^4 resolvable events over four years for a scalar mass near $3 \times 10^{-13}$ eV.
- LISA can detect stochastic background for boson masses between $5 \times 10^{-19}$ eV and $5 \times 10^{-16}$ eV, with around 10^3 resolvable events in a similar timeframe for a scalar mass near $10^{-17}$ eV.
- LISA's capabilities extend to measuring spins for black-hole binaries with component masses ranging from $10^3$ solar masses to $10^7$ solar masses, beyond traditional techniques.
- Statistical analysis of binary systems' spin distributions may rule out certain scalar field mass ranges or achieve ten percent accuracy if light scalars exist within specific intervals.
- The study demonstrates how advanced gravitational wave detectors like LIGO and LISA offer insights into ultralight bosons' interactions with spinning black holes.
Abstract: Ultralight bosons can induce superradiant instabilities in spinning black holes, tapping their rotational energy to trigger the growth of a bosonic condensate. Possible observational imprints of these boson clouds include (i) direct detection of the nearly monochromatic (resolvable or stochastic) gravitational waves emitted by the condensate, and (ii) statistically significant evidence for the formation of "holes" at large spins in the spin versus mass plane (sometimes also referred to as "Regge plane") of astrophysical black holes. In this work, we focus on the prospects of LISA and LIGO detecting or constraining scalars with mass in the range $m_s\in [10^{-19},\,10^{-15}]$ eV and $m_s\in [10^{-14},\,10^{-11}]$ eV, respectively. Using astrophysical models of black-hole populations and black-hole perturbation theory calculations of the gravitational emission, we find that LIGO could observe a stochastic background of gravitational radiation in the range $m_s\in [2\times 10^{-13}, 10^{-12}]$ eV, and up to $\sim 10^4$ resolvable events in a $4$-year search if $m_s\sim 3\times 10^{-13}\,{\rm eV}$. LISA could observe a stochastic background for boson masses in the range $m_s\in [5\times 10^{-19}, 5\times 10^{-16}]$, and up to $\sim 10^3$ resolvable events in a $4$-year search if $m_s\sim 10^{-17}\,{\rm eV}$. LISA could further measure spins for black-hole binaries with component masses in the range $[10^3, 10^7]~M_\odot$, which is not probed by traditional spin-measurement techniques. A statistical analysis of the spin distribution of these binaries could either rule out scalar fields in the mass range $[4 \times 10^{-18}, 10^{-14}]$ eV, or measure $m_s$ with ten percent accuracy if light scalars in the mass range $[10^{-17}, 10^{-13}]$ eV exist.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.