AI summary · arXiv: 1609.02334v1 · q-fin.EC

The interaction between trade and FDI: the CEE countries experience

Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu (UPT), Daniel Goyeau (CRIEF)

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 08 Sep. 2016 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Commercial integration of Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries within the EU has slowed down since the financial crisis.
  • The study aims to identify factors that support this integration process.
  • FDI can influence trade intensity, but previous studies on CEE countries have presented mixed evidence.
  • The objective of this research is to assess intra-integration among CEE countries.
  • Outward FDI plays a significant role in sustaining commercial integration among CEE countries.
  • Inward FDI does not have a significant effect on integration.
  • There is evidence of a complementarity effect between trade and FDI across all cases examined in this study.
  • Policymakers are encouraged to promote outward FDI towards neighboring countries to enhance commercial integration.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Trade FDI CEE countries EU integration Complementarity

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This paper examines the interaction between trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, specifically focusing on the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and the Slovak Republic. The authors note that while commercial integration of these countries within the European Union (EU) had gained momentum prior to the financial crisis, it has slowed down since then. Therefore, there is a need to identify factors that support this integration process. The study builds upon recent findings in new trade theory which suggest that FDI can influence trade intensity. However, previous studies investigating this relationship for CEE countries have presented mixed evidence and mainly focused on their integration with older EU member states. In light of this background, the objective of this research is to assess intra-integration among CEE countries. To achieve this objective, the authors employ a panel gravitational model for bilateral trade and FDI. They consider interactions between each country in their sample (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovak Republic) with the other three countries as well as with their three main commercial partners within the EU. The analysis covers different aspects of the trade-FDI nexus using fixed effects models, random effects models, and instrumental variable estimators over the period 2000-2013. The results indicate that outward FDI plays a significant role in sustaining commercial integration among CEE countries. On the other hand, inward FDI does not have a significant effect on integration. Additionally, there is evidence of a complementarity effect between trade and FDI across all cases examined in this study. This complementarity effect is particularly strong for historical trade partners of CEE countries. Based on these findings, policymakers in CEE countries are encouraged to promote outward FDI towards neighboring countries as a means to enhance commercial integration. Overall, this research contributes to understanding the dynamics between trade and FDI in CEE countries and provides insights into policies that can further support their integration within the EU.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.