DEW: A Fast Level 1 Cache Simulation Approach for Embedded Processors with FIFO Replacement Policy

Authors: Mohammad Shihabul Haque, Jorgen Peddersen, Andhi Janapsatya, Sri Parameswaran

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1506.03181v2

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Abstract: Increasing the speed of cache simulation to obtain hit/miss rates en- ables performance estimation, cache exploration for embedded sys- tems and energy estimation. Previously, such simulations, particu- larly exact approaches, have been exclusively for caches which uti- lize the least recently used (LRU) replacement policy. In this paper, we propose a new, fast and exact cache simulation method for the First In First Out(FIFO) replacement policy. This method, called DEW, is able to simulate multiple level 1 cache configurations (dif- ferent set sizes, associativities, and block sizes) with FIFO replace- ment policy. DEW utilizes a binomial tree based representation of cache configurations and a novel searching method to speed up sim- ulation over single cache simulators like Dinero IV. Depending on different cache block sizes and benchmark applications, DEW oper- ates around 8 to 40 times faster than Dinero IV. Dinero IV compares 2.17 to 19.42 times more cache ways than DEW to determine accu- rate miss rates.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Jun. 2015

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.