Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context

Authors: Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, C. Lawrence Zitnick

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1405.0312v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context" presents a new dataset that aims to advance the state-of-the-art in object recognition by considering the broader question of scene understanding. The dataset consists of images of complex everyday scenes containing common objects in their natural context. To aid in understanding an object's precise 2D location, per-instance segmentations are used for labeling objects. The dataset includes photos of 91 object types that can be easily recognized by a 4-year-old, along with per-instance segmentation masks. The creation of this dataset involved extensive crowd worker involvement through innovative user interfaces for category detection, instance spotting, and instance segmentation. In total, there are 2.5 million labeled instances distributed across 328,000 images. To provide a comprehensive analysis, the authors compare their dataset to existing datasets such as PASCAL, ImageNet and SUN. Additionally, the paper presents baseline performance analysis for bounding box and segmentation detection results using a Deformable Parts Model. The authors provide detailed statistical analysis and highlight the strengths and limitations of their dataset compared to others. Overall, this paper introduces a valuable resource for advancing object recognition and scene understanding research by providing a large-scale dataset with precise annotations and contextual information about common objects in real-world scenes.
AI-generated keywords: Microsoft COCO Object Recognition Scene Understanding Dataset Annotations

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper presents a new dataset called Microsoft COCO that aims to advance object recognition and scene understanding.
  • The dataset consists of images of complex everyday scenes with common objects in their natural context.
  • Per-instance segmentations are used for labeling objects, aiding in understanding an object's precise 2D location.
  • The dataset includes photos of 91 easily recognizable object types along with per-instance segmentation masks.
  • Extensive crowd worker involvement was involved in creating the dataset through innovative user interfaces.
  • There are 2.5 million labeled instances distributed across 328,000 images in the dataset.
  • The authors compare their dataset to existing datasets such as PASCAL, ImageNet, and SUN for comprehensive analysis.
  • Baseline performance analysis for bounding box and segmentation detection results using a Deformable Parts Model is presented.
  • Detailed statistical analysis is provided, highlighting the strengths and limitations of the dataset compared to others.
  • Overall, the paper introduces a valuable resource for advancing object recognition and scene understanding research.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We present a new dataset with the goal of advancing the state-of-the-art in object recognition by placing the question of object recognition in the context of the broader question of scene understanding. This is achieved by gathering images of complex everyday scenes containing common objects in their natural context. Objects are labeled using per-instance segmentations to aid in understanding an object's precise 2D location. Our dataset contains photos of 91 objects types that would be easily recognizable by a 4 year old along with per-instance segmentation masks. With a total of 2.5 million labeled instances in 328k images, the creation of our dataset drew upon extensive crowd worker involvement via novel user interfaces for category detection, instance spotting and instance segmentation. We present a detailed statistical analysis of the dataset in comparison to PASCAL, ImageNet, and SUN. Finally, we provide baseline performance analysis for bounding box and segmentation detection results using a Deformable Parts Model.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 May. 2014

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.