Option Pricing, Historical Volatility and Tail Risks

Authors: Samuel E. Vazquez

arXiv: 1402.1255v1 - DOI (q-fin.PR)
29 pages, 15 figures

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1402.1255v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In the paper "Option Pricing, Historical Volatility and Tail Risks," Samuel E. Vazquez revisits the problem of pricing options using historical volatility estimators in the context of a generalized GARCH model with multiple time scales and asymmetry. The paper argues that the observed volatility risk premium is due to tail risk aversion and parametrizes such risk aversion in terms of three coefficients: convexity, skew, and kurtosis risk premium. The paper proposes that option prices under the real-world measure are not martingales but that their drift is governed by such tail risk premia. The paper derives a fair-pricing equation for options and shows that solutions can be written in terms of a stochastic volatility model in continuous time and under a martingale probability measure. This gives a precise connection between pricing and real-world probability measures, which cannot be obtained using Girsanov Theorem. The paper finds that the convexity risk premium not only shifts the overall implied volatility level but also changes its term structure. Moreover, the skew risk premium makes the skewness of the volatility smile steeper than a pure historical estimate. The paper derives analytical formulas for certain implied moments using the Bergomi-Guyon expansion, allowing for very fast calibrations of models. The paper provides examples of a particular model that can reproduce the observed SPX volatility surface using very few parameters. Overall, this paper provides insights into how tail risks affect option pricing and offers practical implications for modeling financial markets with multiple time scales and asymmetry.
AI-generated keywords: Option Pricing Historical Volatility Tail Risks GARCH Model Asymmetry

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper "Option Pricing, Historical Volatility and Tail Risks" by Samuel E. Vazquez revisits the problem of pricing options using historical volatility estimators in the context of a generalized GARCH model with multiple time scales and asymmetry.
  • The observed volatility risk premium is due to tail risk aversion and is parametrized in terms of three coefficients: convexity, skew, and kurtosis risk premium.
  • Option prices under the real-world measure are not martingales but their drift is governed by such tail risk premia.
  • A fair-pricing equation for options is derived and solutions can be written in terms of a stochastic volatility model in continuous time and under a martingale probability measure.
  • The convexity risk premium not only shifts the overall implied volatility level but also changes its term structure.
  • The skew risk premium makes the skewness of the volatility smile steeper than a pure historical estimate.
  • Analytical formulas for certain implied moments are derived using the Bergomi-Guyon expansion, allowing for very fast calibrations of models.
  • Examples are provided of a particular model that can reproduce the observed SPX volatility surface using very few parameters.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We revisit the problem of pricing options with historical volatility estimators. We do this in the context of a generalized GARCH model with multiple time scales and asymmetry. It is argued that the reason for the observed volatility risk premium is tail risk aversion. We parametrize such risk aversion in terms of three coefficients: convexity, skew and kurtosis risk premium. We propose that option prices under the real-world measure are not martingales, but that their drift is governed by such tail risk premia. We then derive a fair-pricing equation for options and show that the solutions can be written in terms of a stochastic volatility model in continuous time and under a martingale probability measure. This gives a precise connection between the pricing and real-world probability measures, which cannot be obtained using Girsanov Theorem. We find that the convexity risk premium, not only shifts the overall implied volatility level, but also changes its term structure. Moreover, the skew risk premium makes the skewness of the volatility smile steeper than a pure historical estimate. We derive analytical formulas for certain implied moments using the Bergomi-Guyon expansion. This allows for very fast calibrations of the models. We show examples of a particular model which can reproduce the observed SPX volatility surface using very few parameters.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Feb. 2014

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.