AI summary · arXiv: 1312.6211v1 · stat.ML

An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgeting in Gradient-Based Neural Networks

Ian J. Goodfellow, Mehdi Mirza, Xia Da, Aaron Courville, Yoshua Bengio

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 21 Dec. 2013 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

AI-generated keywords: Catastrophic Forgetting Neural Networks Gradient-Based Training Activation Functions Solutions

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper titled "An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networks," Ian J. Goodfellow, Mehdi Mirza, Xia Da, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio explore the issue of catastrophic forgetting faced by many machine learning models and algorithms. This phenomenon occurs when trained on one task and then trained on a second task; these models tend to forget how to perform the first task. This is particularly problematic for neural networks as they are prone to this type of forgetting. The authors investigate the extent to which this problem occurs in modern neural networks by comparing established and recent gradient-based training algorithms and activation functions. They also examine how the relationship between the first task and the second task affects catastrophic forgetting. Their empirical investigation provides insights into potential solutions for mitigating catastrophic forgetting in neural networks while shedding light on this important issue faced by machine learning models.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.