Optical Polarization and Spectral Variability in the M87 Jet
Authors: Eric S. Perlman (FIT), Steven C. Adams (U. Georgia), Mihai Cara (FIT), Matthew Bourque (FIT), D. E. Harris (CfA), Juan P. Madrid (Swinburne), Raymond C. Simons (FIT), Eric Clausen-Brown (Purdue), C. C. Cheung (NRL), Lukasz Stawarz (JAXA), Markos Georganopoulos (UMBC and GSFC), William B. Sparks (STScI), John A. Biretta (STScI)
AI-generated Key Points
- The M87 jet has exhibited extraordinary variability over the last decade
- One knot (HST-1) increased in brightness by over a factor of 100
- Nuclear flux also showed variability on timescales of months
- Study discusses optical-UV polarization and spectral variability of components with vastly different behavior
- HST-1 shows highly significant correlation between flux and polarization, with P increasing from around 20% at minimum to over 40% at maximum, while orientation of electric vector remained constant
- Optical-UV spectrum of HST-1 is very hard ($\alpha_{UV-O}\sim0.5$, $F_\nu\propto\nu^{-\alpha}$), displaying "hard lags" during epochs 2004.9-2005.5, including peak of flare, with soft lags at later epochs.
- Behavior of HST-1 interpreted as enhanced particle acceleration in a shock with cooling from both particle aging and relaxation of compression.
- Upper limits set on size and advance speed of flaring region at 0.5 $\delta$ parsecs and 1.02$c$, respectively.
- Slight deviation in electric vector orientation from jet PA suggests that on smaller scales, flaring region may have either double or twisted structure.
- In contrast to HST-1's behavior, nucleus displays much more rapid variability with highly variable electric vector orientation and 'looping' in the $(I,P)$ plane but does not show UV-optical spectral variability.
- Behavior can be interpreted as either a helical distortion to a steady jet or a shock propagating through a helical jet.
- Study provides important insights into M87's jet dynamics and highlights how different regions within it exhibit vastly different behaviors even though they are part of one continuous structure.
- Further studies will be necessary to fully understand complex dynamics of this jet and gain further insight into its dynamic properties such as size and speed limits for flaring regions as well as possible double or twisted structures on smaller scales than previously thought possible for this type of system.
Abstract: During the last decade, M87's jet has been the site of an extraordinary variability event, with one knot (HST-1) increasing by over a factor 100 in brightness. Variability was also seen on timescales of months in the nuclear flux. Here we discuss the optical-UV polarization and spectral variability of these components, which show vastly different behavior. HST-1 shows a highly significant correlation between flux and polarization, with P increasing from $\sim 20%$ at minimum to >40% at maximum, while the orientation of its electric vector stayed constant. HST-1's optical-UV spectrum is very hard ($\alpha_{UV-O}\sim0.5$, $F_\nu\propto\nu^{-\alpha}$), and displays "hard lags" during epochs 2004.9-2005.5, including the peak of the flare, with soft lags at later epochs. We interpret the behavior of HST-1 as enhanced particle acceleration in a shock, with cooling from both particle aging and the relaxation of the compression. We set 2$\sigma$ upper limits of $0.5 \delta$ parsecs and 1.02$c$ on the size and advance speed of the flaring region. The slight deviation of the electric vector orientation from the jet PA, makes it likely that on smaller scales the flaring region has either a double or twisted structure. By contrast, the nucleus displays much more rapid variability, with a highly variable electric vector orientation and 'looping' in the $(I,P)$ plane. The nucleus has a much steeper spectrum ($\alpha_{UV-O} \sim 1.5$) but does not show UV-optical spectral variability. Its behavior can be interpreted as either a helical distortion to a steady jet or a shock propagating through a helical jet.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.