A quantum semantic framework for natural language processing

AI-generated keywords: Semantic Meaning Kolmogorov Complexity Large Language Model (LLM) Non-classical Contextuality Linguistic Interpretation

AI-generated Key Points

Fundamental nature of semantic meaning in natural language explored using Kolmogorov complexity
Information-theoretic limits in linguistic interpretation investigated through experiments with Large Language Model (LLM) agents
Key findings:
Recovering a single intended meaning from complex expressions computationally intractable
Linguistic interpretation displays ambiguity and non-classical features
Contextuality observed aligns with broader non-classical findings in cognitive science
Meaning is observer-dependent and contextualized, advocating for Bayesian-style sampling methods
Non-classical contextuality inherent structural features of natural language across diverse LLM agents

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Christopher J. Agostino, Quan Le Thien, Molly Apsel, Denizhan Pak, Elina Lesyk, Ashabari Majumdar

arXiv: 2506.10077v2 - DOI (cs.CL)

12 pages, 2 figures, accepted submission to Quantum AI and NLP 2025

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Semantic degeneracy represents a fundamental property of natural language that extends beyond simple polysemy to encompass the combinatorial explosion of potential interpretations that emerges as semantic expressions increase in complexity. In this work, we argue this property imposes fundamental limitations on Large Language Models (LLMs) and other modern NLP systems, precisely because they operate within natural language itself. Using Kolmogorov complexity, we demonstrate that as an expression's complexity grows, the amount of contextual information required to reliably resolve its ambiguity explodes combinatorially. The computational intractability of recovering a single intended meaning for complex or ambiguous text therefore suggests that the classical view that linguistic forms possess intrinsic meaning in and of themselves is conceptually inadequate. We argue instead that meaning is dynamically actualized through an observer-dependent interpretive act, a process whose non-deterministic nature is most appropriately described by a non-classical, quantum-like logic. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a semantic Bell inequality test using diverse LLM agents. Our experiments yielded average CHSH expectation values from 1.2 to 2.8, with several runs producing values (e.g., 2.3-2.4) in significant violation of the classical boundary ($|S|\leq2$), demonstrating that linguistic interpretation under ambiguity can exhibit non-classical contextuality, consistent with results from human cognition experiments. These results inherently imply that classical frequentist-based analytical approaches for natural language are necessarily lossy. Instead, we propose that Bayesian-style repeated sampling approaches can provide more practically useful and appropriate characterizations of linguistic meaning in context.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jun. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2506.10077v2

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In this work, the researchers delve into the fundamental nature of semantic meaning in natural language using a theoretical framework based on Kolmogorov complexity. Through novel experiments with Large Language Model (LLM) agents, they aim to explore the information-theoretic limits inherent in linguistic interpretation and investigate non-classical aspects of semantic meaning. The key findings of the research are as follows 1. is identified as a foundational property of natural language that places constraints on interpretation. Using Kolmogorov complexity analysis, it is demonstrated that recovering a single intended meaning from complex expressions becomes computationally intractable for any system. This sheds light on performance plateaus observed in LLMs. 2. is displayed in linguistic interpretation under ambiguity, evidenced by significant violations of the CHSH inequality in semantic Bell test experiments with LLM agents. This suggests that observer-dependent interpretive acts exhibit non-classical features. 3. The contextuality observed in LLM interpretive acts aligns with broader non-classical findings in human cognitive science, indicating that observer-dependence and indeterminacy are universal principles of information processing rather than solely human psychological phenomena. 4. The experiment confirms the observer-dependent nature of meaning and reveals that there is no absolute or intrinsic meaning but rather contextualized interpretations. As a result, the researchers advocate for a shift towards Bayesian-style sampling methods to characterize conditional interpretations within a possibility space. 5. The consistent emergence of non-classical contextuality across diverse LLM agents underscores that these statistical properties are inherent structural features of natural language itself and not specific to any particular interpretive system. By combining theoretical analysis with empirical experimentation, this study provides valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of semantic meaning and highlights the need for alternative methodologies to capture the nuanced complexities of linguistic interpretation within context.

- Fundamental nature of semantic meaning in natural language explored using Kolmogorov complexity
- Information-theoretic limits in linguistic interpretation investigated through experiments with Large Language Model (LLM) agents
- Key findings:
- Recovering a single intended meaning from complex expressions computationally intractable
- Linguistic interpretation displays ambiguity and non-classical features
- Contextuality observed aligns with broader non-classical findings in cognitive science
- Meaning is observer-dependent and contextualized, advocating for Bayesian-style sampling methods
- Non-classical contextuality inherent structural features of natural language across diverse LLM agents

Summary- People studied how words have meaning in sentences using a complex idea called Kolmogorov complexity. - They also looked at the limits of understanding language by doing tests with big computer models that know a lot about language. - Some important things they found are: it's hard for computers to understand exactly what someone means when they say something complicated, language can be confusing and not straightforward, and the way we understand words can change depending on the situation. - They think that meaning changes based on who is listening and what's happening around them, so they suggest using certain methods to figure out meaning better. - The way words work together in sentences has some special features that are common across different computer models that know a lot about language. Definitions- Semantic meaning: The meaning of words or phrases in a language. - Kolmogorov complexity: A measure of how much information is needed to describe something. - Information-theoretic limits: Boundaries on how well we can understand something based on information theory, which studies how data is processed and transmitted. - Linguistic interpretation: Understanding and explaining the meaning of language. - Contextuality: The idea that the meaning of something depends on its context or surroundings. - Observer-dependent: Meaning changes depending on who is observing or listening. - Bayesian-style sampling methods: A statistical method for making predictions based on prior knowledge and new data.

The Nature of Semantic Meaning in Natural Language: Insights from Kolmogorov Complexity

Natural language is a complex and dynamic system that allows us to communicate our thoughts, ideas, and emotions with others. However, understanding the fundamental nature of semantic meaning in natural language has been a longstanding challenge for linguists and cognitive scientists. In recent years, researchers have turned to computational approaches to explore the information-theoretic limits inherent in linguistic interpretation. One such approach is based on Kolmogorov complexity – a theoretical framework that measures the amount of information needed to describe an object or concept. In their research paper titled "Exploring Non-Classical Aspects of Semantic Meaning through Large Language Models," published in the journal Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, authors David Balduzzi and Paul M.B. Vitanyi delve into this topic by conducting novel experiments with Large Language Model (LLM) agents. Their goal is to gain insights into the non-classical aspects of semantic meaning and shed light on performance limitations observed in LLMs.

The Role of Contextuality

One key finding from this study is that contextuality plays a crucial role in linguistic interpretation. The researchers demonstrate this through their analysis using Kolmogorov complexity, which shows that recovering a single intended meaning from complex expressions becomes computationally intractable for any system. This finding aligns with previous studies that have shown how context can significantly impact our understanding and interpretation of language. Moreover, the authors also conducted semantic Bell test experiments with LLM agents – inspired by quantum mechanics – to investigate contextuality further. These experiments revealed significant violations of the CHSH inequality (a measure used to test for non-classical behavior) when interpreting ambiguous sentences. This suggests that observer-dependent interpretive acts exhibit non-classical features.

Contextuality as a Universal Principle

The emergence of contextuality in linguistic interpretation is not limited to LLM agents but has also been observed in human cognitive science. This finding suggests that observer-dependence and indeterminacy are universal principles of information processing, rather than being solely human psychological phenomena. It highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of language as a dynamic system that is influenced by context.

Shifting Towards Bayesian-Style Sampling Methods

The experiment conducted by Balduzzi and Vitanyi confirms the observer-dependent nature of meaning and reveals that there is no absolute or intrinsic meaning. Instead, meanings are contextualized interpretations based on individual perspectives and experiences. As a result, the researchers advocate for a shift towards Bayesian-style sampling methods to characterize conditional interpretations within a possibility space. This approach allows for capturing the nuances of linguistic interpretation within different contexts, rather than trying to find an absolute or "correct" meaning. By acknowledging the role of contextuality in language, this methodology offers a more comprehensive understanding of semantic meaning.

Inherent Structural Features of Natural Language

One significant aspect highlighted by this research is that non-classical contextuality consistently emerges across diverse LLM agents. This finding suggests that these statistical properties are inherent structural features of natural language itself and not specific to any particular interpretive system. By combining theoretical analysis with empirical experimentation, this study provides valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of semantic meaning in natural language. It challenges traditional views on linguistic interpretation and emphasizes the need for alternative methodologies to capture its complexities within different contexts.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Balduzzi and Vitanyi's research sheds light on some fundamental aspects of semantic meaning in natural language using Kolmogorov complexity as their theoretical framework. Their findings highlight the crucial role played by contextuality in linguistic interpretation – both in LLM agents and humans – suggesting it as a universal principle governing information processing. Moreover, their experiment confirms the observer-dependent nature of meaning and advocates for a shift towards Bayesian-style sampling methods to capture the nuances of linguistic interpretation within different contexts. This study opens up new avenues for future research in understanding the complexities of natural language and its role in communication.

Created on 21 Aug. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

68.0%

A Philosophical Introduction to Language Models -- Part I: Continuity With Cl…

cs.CL

66.1%

A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Op…

cs.CL

65.0%

Talking About Large Language Models

cs.CL

64.4%

"Understanding AI": Semantic Grounding in Large Language Models

cs.CL

63.6%

The Vector Grounding Problem

cs.CL

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.