Infrastructure for AI Agents

AI-generated keywords: AI agents agent infrastructure accountability interaction shaping incident management

AI-generated Key Points

  • The need for tools to unlock benefits and manage risks of AI systems in open-ended environments is increasing.
  • Current tools are insufficient in shaping interactions between AI agents and existing institutions and actors.
  • The concept of agent infrastructure is proposed as external technical systems and shared protocols to mediate and influence AI agents' interactions with their environments.
  • Agent infrastructure includes new tools or modifications of existing ones, such as leveraging authentication systems like OpenID for accountability.
  • Three key functions of agent infrastructure are attributing actions to specific agents/users, shaping interactions, and detecting/remedying harmful actions.
  • Various infrastructural solutions are proposed to achieve these functions while considering use cases, adoption challenges, limitations, and unresolved questions.
  • Isolating traffic could be a viable strategy for incident management by allowing service providers to shut down agent channels without affecting human channels to contain malicious content spread.
  • Effective infrastructural solutions are crucial for responsible AI development and deployment in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Alan Chan, Kevin Wei, Sihao Huang, Nitarshan Rajkumar, Elija Perrier, Seth Lazar, Gillian K. Hadfield, Markus Anderljung

License: CC ZERO 1.0

Abstract: Increasingly many AI systems can plan and execute interactions in open-ended environments, such as making phone calls or buying online goods. As developers grow the space of tasks that such AI agents can accomplish, we will need tools both to unlock their benefits and manage their risks. Current tools are largely insufficient because they are not designed to shape how agents interact with existing institutions (e.g., legal and economic systems) or actors (e.g., digital service providers, humans, other AI agents). For example, alignment techniques by nature do not assure counterparties that some human will be held accountable when a user instructs an agent to perform an illegal action. To fill this gap, we propose the concept of agent infrastructure: technical systems and shared protocols external to agents that are designed to mediate and influence their interactions with and impacts on their environments. Agent infrastructure comprises both new tools and reconfigurations or extensions of existing tools. For example, to facilitate accountability, protocols that tie users to agents could build upon existing systems for user authentication, such as OpenID. Just as the Internet relies on infrastructure like HTTPS, we argue that agent infrastructure will be similarly indispensable to ecosystems of agents. We identify three functions for agent infrastructure: 1) attributing actions, properties, and other information to specific agents, their users, or other actors; 2) shaping agents' interactions; and 3) detecting and remedying harmful actions from agents. We propose infrastructure that could help achieve each function, explaining use cases, adoption, limitations, and open questions. Making progress on agent infrastructure can prepare society for the adoption of more advanced agents.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Jan. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2501.10114v1

In a world where AI systems are increasingly capable of planning and executing interactions in open-ended environments, the need for tools to unlock their benefits and manage their risks is becoming more apparent. Current tools fall short in shaping how these AI agents interact with existing institutions and actors, such as legal and economic systems, digital service providers, humans, and other AI agents. For instance, alignment techniques do not guarantee accountability when users instruct agents to perform illegal actions. To address this gap, the concept of agent infrastructure is proposed: technical systems and shared protocols external to agents that mediate and influence their interactions with their environments. Agent infrastructure encompasses new tools as well as reconfigurations or extensions of existing ones. For example, protocols tying users to agents could leverage existing authentication systems like OpenID to enhance accountability. Just as the Internet relies on infrastructure like HTTPS for secure communication, agent infrastructure is deemed essential for ecosystems of agents. Three key functions of agent infrastructure are identified: attributing actions and information to specific agents or users, shaping agents' interactions, and detecting/remedying harmful actions. To advance progress in this area, various infrastructural solutions are proposed to achieve each function while considering use cases, adoption challenges, limitations, and unresolved questions. By developing robust agent infrastructure that can attribute actions accurately, shape interactions effectively, and detect/remedy harmful behavior promptly,society can better prepare for the adoption of more advanced AI agents. Furthermore, considerations around macroeconomic effects resulting from high volumes of agent activity highlight the importance of managing incidents effectively. Isolating traffic could be a viable strategy for incident management by allowing service providers to shut down agent channels without affecting human channels in order to contain the spread of malicious content. In conclusion,is crucial for ensuring responsible AI development and deployment in a rapidly evolving technological landscape. By addressing issues related to accountability, interaction shaping, incident management, and macroeconomic effects through effective infrastructural solutions, we can pave the way for a more sustainable integration of advanced AI technologies into society.
Created on 15 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.