Trust AI Regulation? Discerning users are vital to build trust and effective AI regulation

AI-generated keywords: Trustworthy AI Regulation Evolutionary Game Theory User Trust Incentivization

AI-generated Key Points

  • Regulation is crucial for incentivizing AI creators to develop trustworthy systems and for users to trust these systems
  • There is a debate on the form and implementation of AI regulations
  • Authors propose using evolutionary game theory as a tool to model dilemmas faced by users, AI creators, and regulators
  • Effective regulation requires regulators to be incentivized to regulate efficiently
  • Mechanisms for incentivization include governments recognizing and rewarding regulators who excel in their duties, as well as users influencing trust decisions based on regulator effectiveness
  • Evaluating diverse regulatory frameworks through an evolutionary game theoretic lens is essential for establishing a regulatory environment conducive to fostering trust in AI systems
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Zainab Alalawi, Paolo Bova, Theodor Cimpeanu, Alessandro Di Stefano, Manh Hong Duong, Elias Fernandez Domingos, The Anh Han, Marcus Krellner, Bianca Ogbo, Simon T. Powers, Filippo Zimmaro

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: There is general agreement that some form of regulation is necessary both for AI creators to be incentivised to develop trustworthy systems, and for users to actually trust those systems. But there is much debate about what form these regulations should take and how they should be implemented. Most work in this area has been qualitative, and has not been able to make formal predictions. Here, we propose that evolutionary game theory can be used to quantitatively model the dilemmas faced by users, AI creators, and regulators, and provide insights into the possible effects of different regulatory regimes. We show that creating trustworthy AI and user trust requires regulators to be incentivised to regulate effectively. We demonstrate the effectiveness of two mechanisms that can achieve this. The first is where governments can recognise and reward regulators that do a good job. In that case, if the AI system is not too risky for users then some level of trustworthy development and user trust evolves. We then consider an alternative solution, where users can condition their trust decision on the effectiveness of the regulators. This leads to effective regulation, and consequently the development of trustworthy AI and user trust, provided that the cost of implementing regulations is not too high. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the effect of different regulatory regimes from an evolutionary game theoretic perspective.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.09510v1

In their paper titled "Trust AI Regulation? Discerning users are vital to build trust and effective AI," Zainab Alalawi, Paolo Bova, Theodor Cimpeanu, Alessandro Di Stefano, Manh Hong Duong, Elias Fernandez Domingos, The Anh Han, Marcus Krellner, Bianca Ogbo, Simon T. Powers, and Filippo Zimmaro delve into the necessity of regulation in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). They acknowledge the consensus that regulation is crucial for incentivizing AI creators to develop trustworthy systems and for users to place their trust in these systems. However, there exists a significant debate regarding the form and implementation of such regulations. The authors propose leveraging evolutionary game theory as a quantitative tool to model the dilemmas faced by users, AI creators, and regulators. By doing so, they aim to provide insights into the potential impacts of different regulatory regimes on the development of trustworthy AI and user trust. Their analysis reveals that effective regulation hinges on regulators being incentivized to regulate efficiently. Two mechanisms are highlighted as key drivers of this incentivization process. Firstly,governments can play a role by recognizing and rewarding regulators who excel in their duties. This approach fosters trustworthy development and user trust if the AI system's risk level remains manageable for users. Alternatively,user scan influence trust decisions based on regulator effectiveness.This strategy leads to effective regulationand subsequently promotes the cultivation of trustworthy AIand user trust – provided that regulatory implementation costs remain reasonable. The findings underscore the significance of evaluating diverse regulatory frameworks through an evolutionary game theoretic lens.By considering these dynamics comprehensively,stakeholders can work towards establishing a regulatory environment conducive to fostering trust in AI systems while ensuring their reliability and safety for end-users.
Created on 17 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.