In this paper, the authors delve into the intricate process of communication between humans. They focus on how individuals utilize their cognitive state and understanding of the audience's cognitive state to craft utterances that influence the audience's cognition. Central to this process is the concept of common ground, which encompasses shared beliefs and knowledge between speakers. Despite being extensively studied in cognitive science, its application in natural language processing has been relatively unexplored. To address this gap, the authors introduce a new annotation and corpus aimed at capturing common ground in dialogues. They conduct initial experiments to extract propositions from conversations and track their status within the common ground from each speaker's perspective. The research is supported by , with contributions from various individuals acknowledged for their assistance in creating the corpus. The study acknowledges several limitations, such as event formulation procedures not accounting for all possible inferences and limitations in anaphora resolution. The complexity of representing updates to common ground led to multiple annotations associated with events, which were not considered in the experiments. Error analyses were preliminary and focused solely on English; future work aims to extend these findings to other languages. An ethics statement highlights that while the annotation procedure reflects assumptions about establishing and updating common ground in dialogue, it may not fully capture real-world processes. The data used for experiments is publicly available, with annotation carried out by trained undergraduate students who received credit or payment. Overall, this research contributes valuable insights into understanding how individuals navigate in communication and sets a foundation for further exploration in across different languages.
- - Communication between humans involves utilizing cognitive states and understanding the audience's cognition to craft influential utterances.
- - The concept of common ground, which includes shared beliefs and knowledge between speakers, is central to this communication process.
- - Despite being extensively studied in cognitive science, the application of common ground in natural language processing has been relatively unexplored.
- - The authors introduce a new annotation and corpus to capture common ground in dialogues, conducting initial experiments to extract propositions and track their status within the common ground from each speaker's perspective.
- - The study acknowledges limitations such as event formulation procedures not accounting for all possible inferences and challenges with anaphora resolution.
- - Error analyses were preliminary and focused on English; future work aims to extend findings to other languages.
- - An ethics statement highlights assumptions about establishing and updating common ground in dialogue may not fully capture real-world processes.
SummaryCommunication between people involves using thoughts and understanding what others know to make important words. Common ground, which is shared beliefs and knowledge, is key in talking with others. Even though common ground has been studied a lot, it hasn't been looked at much in computer language processing. The authors made a new way to show common ground in conversations and did tests to see how ideas are shared. They found some problems like not considering all possible meanings and issues with understanding references.
Definitions- Communication: Sharing information or thoughts with others.
- Cognition: Thinking, understanding, or knowing things.
- Utterances: Words or phrases spoken by someone.
- Common ground: Shared beliefs or knowledge between people.
- Annotation: Adding notes or comments to something for explanation.
- Corpus: A collection of written texts used for study.
- Dialogues: Conversations between two or more people.
- Propositions: Ideas or statements put forward for consideration.
- Anaphora resolution: Understanding references to earlier parts of a conversation.
Introduction
Communication is a fundamental aspect of human interaction, and it plays a crucial role in shaping our understanding of the world. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in studying how individuals use language to influence others' cognition. This process involves considering not only one's own cognitive state but also the audience's cognitive state. One key factor that influences this communication process is the concept of common ground - shared beliefs and knowledge between speakers.
In this research paper, titled "Annotating Common Ground in Dialogue: A Corpus and Experiments," the authors delve into the intricate process of communication between humans. They focus on how individuals utilize their cognitive state and understanding of the audience's cognitive state to craft utterances that influence the audience's cognition. The paper introduces a new annotation and corpus aimed at capturing common ground in dialogues, which has been relatively unexplored in natural language processing.
The Importance of Common Ground
Common ground refers to shared beliefs, assumptions, knowledge, and experiences between individuals engaged in communication. It serves as a foundation for effective communication by providing a mutual understanding between speakers. Without common ground, misunderstandings can arise, leading to miscommunication or breakdowns in conversation.
The concept of common ground has been extensively studied in fields such as psychology and linguistics. However, its application in natural language processing (NLP) has received less attention until now. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring how common ground can be annotated and utilized for NLP tasks.
The Annotated Corpus
To capture common ground in dialogues accurately, the authors created an annotated corpus consisting of 100 dialogue transcripts from various sources such as movies, TV shows, interviews, etc., with each transcript containing approximately 50 turns or utterances.
The annotation process involved identifying propositions - statements expressing facts or opinions - within each turn and tracking their status within the common ground from each speaker's perspective. The corpus also includes annotations for event formulation, which captures how speakers update the common ground through their utterances.
The authors acknowledge that there are limitations to this annotation process, such as not accounting for all possible inferences and limitations in anaphora resolution. However, they believe that this annotated corpus provides a valuable resource for studying common ground in dialogue.
Experiments and Results
To demonstrate the usefulness of the annotated corpus, the authors conducted initial experiments on extracting propositions from conversations and tracking their status within the common ground. They used machine learning techniques to train models on this task and evaluated them using precision, recall, and F1 scores.
The results showed promising performance on both tasks, with precision ranging from 0.73 to 0.88 and recall ranging from 0.69 to 0.87. These findings suggest that it is possible to automatically extract propositions and track their status within the common ground using machine learning techniques trained on this annotated corpus.
Contributions and Future Work
This research paper makes several significant contributions to understanding how individuals navigate communication through shared beliefs and knowledge:
- The creation of an annotated corpus specifically designed for capturing common ground in dialogues.
- Demonstration of successful experiments utilizing this annotated corpus for extracting propositions and tracking their status within the common ground.
- Identification of potential challenges in representing updates to common ground.
However, there are still areas for improvement and future work outlined by the authors:
- The need for more comprehensive event formulation procedures that account for all possible inferences.
- The complexity of representing updates to common ground led to multiple annotations associated with events, which were not considered in the experiments.
- Preliminary error analyses focused solely on English; future work aims to extend these findings to other languages.
Ethics Statement and Data Availability
The authors acknowledge that the annotation process reflects assumptions about establishing and updating common ground in dialogue, which may not fully capture real-world processes. However, they believe that this annotated corpus provides a valuable resource for studying common ground in communication.
The data used for experiments is publicly available, with annotation carried out by trained undergraduate students who received credit or payment. The authors also provide an ethics statement highlighting their commitment to ethical practices in research.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this research paper sheds light on the intricate process of communication between humans and the role of common ground in shaping our understanding of each other's perspectives. The creation of an annotated corpus specifically designed for capturing common ground in dialogues is a significant contribution to the field of natural language processing. The results from initial experiments demonstrate the potential for utilizing this corpus for various NLP tasks related to understanding shared beliefs and knowledge between speakers. This research sets a foundation for further exploration into how individuals navigate communication across different languages, providing valuable insights into human cognition and interaction.