LLM Based Multi-Document Summarization Exploiting Main-Event Biased Monotone Submodular Content Extraction

AI-generated keywords: Multi-Document Summarization

AI-generated Key Points

  • Multi-document summarization often suffers from subjective bias
  • Low inter-annotator ROUGE-1 score indicates the need for more objective summaries
  • Authors propose an extract-rewrite approach to enhance objectivity
  • Main-event biased monotone-submodular function used for content selection
  • Fine-tuned Language Model (LLM) used for rewriting extracted content into coherent text
  • Contributions: main event biased greedy method, fine-tuned LLM, annotated test set
  • Related work discusses extractive and abstractive methods in text summarization
  • Challenges in maintaining coherence in abstractive methods
  • Interest in Large Language Models (LLMs) but limitations in context length and hallucinations
  • Proposed approach uses content extraction schemes guided by rephrasing extracted content
  • Drawbacks of existing data-driven techniques based on neural networks
  • Paper's contributions highlighted through evaluation using objective metrics and human evaluators
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Litton J Kurisinkel, Nancy F. Chen

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Multi-document summarization is a challenging task due to its inherent subjective bias, highlighted by the low inter-annotator ROUGE-1 score of 0.4 among DUC-2004 reference summaries. In this work, we aim to enhance the objectivity of news summarization by focusing on the main event of a group of related news documents and presenting it coherently with sufficient context. Our primary objective is to succinctly report the main event, ensuring that the summary remains objective and informative. To achieve this, we employ an extract-rewrite approach that incorporates a main-event biased monotone-submodular function for content selection. This enables us to extract the most crucial information related to the main event from the document cluster. To ensure coherence, we utilize a fine-tuned Language Model (LLM) for rewriting the extracted content into a coherent text. The evaluation using objective metrics and human evaluators confirms the effectiveness of our approach, as it surpasses potential baselines, demonstrating excellence in both content coverage, coherence, and informativeness.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.03414v1

Multi-document summarization is a challenging task that often suffers from subjective bias. The existing summary highlights the low inter-annotator ROUGE-1 score among DUC-2004 reference summaries, indicating the need for more objective and informative summaries. In this work, the authors aim to enhance the objectivity of news summarization by focusing on the main event of a group of related news documents and presenting it coherently with sufficient context. To achieve their objective, the authors propose an extract-rewrite approach that incorporates a main-event biased monotone-submodular function for content selection. This approach allows them to extract the most crucial information related to the main event from the document cluster. Additionally, they utilize a fine-tuned Language Model (LLM) for rewriting the extracted content into a coherent text. The paper introduces several contributions. Firstly, it presents a main event biased greedy method that formulates an objective content extraction method for Multi-Document Summarization (MDS). This method uses a monotone submodular function with linear components for coverage, diversity, and coherence. Secondly, it introduces a fine-tuned Language Model (LLM) that takes the extracted content and rewrites it to create a coherent summary. In addition to these contributions, the paper also introduces an annotated test set consisting of 30 clusters of documents and corresponding main event-focused summaries. This test set serves as an evaluation benchmark for assessing the effectiveness of their approach. The related work section discusses different approaches in text summarization, including extractive and abstractive methods. Extractive methods involve selecting and combining sentences directly from the original text, while abstractive methods aim to generate summaries by compressing information. However, maintaining coherence has been a challenge in abstractive methods. Some researchers have proposed leveraging corpus-level discourse graphs to achieve both structural and topical coherence. Recent studies have also focused on neural network-based text-to-text generation methods which involve training neural networks to automatically extract features from input text and generate desired outputs but often lack control over summary attributes due to limitations in learning from large datasets. The introduction of Large Language Models (LLMs) has sparked interest in NLP methods; however memory efficient LLMs may still have limitations in context length and could experience hallucinations when generating output summaries.. In this work, the authors explore a more manageable approach that can be applied in real world scenarios by proposing using dedicated content extraction schemes guided by rephrasing extracted content to produce coherent output summaries instead of relying solely on neural networks or LLMs alone . The problem definition section discusses drawbacks associated with existing data driven techniques based on neural networks such as difficulty learning effectively from large volumes of training data or producing human written style texts with good quality control during generation process . Overall this refined detailed summary provides comprehensive overview of paper's contributions , related works , problem definition , highlighting authors' approach enhancing objectivity news summarization through content selection & rewriting using fine tuned language model . Paper's effectiveness confirmed through evaluation using objective metrics & human evaluators surpassing potential baselines terms content coverage , coherence & informativeness .
Created on 06 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.