Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.02328v1

This paper explores the concept of cultivated wildness at the intersection of landscape design and artificial intelligence. It argues that contemporary landscape practices should move beyond a singular understanding of wilderness and instead focus on cultivating new forms of wild places through interdisciplinary approaches in Environmental Humanities, Science and Technology Studies, Ecological Sciences, and Landscape Architecture. The paper proposes a framework for constructing wild places with intelligent machines, viewing machines not as passive tools but as active agents capable of participating in co-production. It highlights the potential contributions of cybernetic technologies such as sensing networks, artificial intelligence, and cyberphysical systems to this framework. Central to this framework is the concept of "technodiversity," which parallels biodiversity and emphasizes the recognition of diverse technological relationships with the environment. The paper suggests that cultivated wildness involves acknowledging "wildness" in machines. The paper further expands on its proposed framework by discussing the idea of rewilding urban environments. It argues that designing urban wilds goes beyond creating natural-looking landscapes or restoring historical ecological patterns. Instead, it advocates for practices that promote the autonomy of nonhuman species alongside machine agents as active co-conspirators in shaping landscapes. The paper explores how intelligent machines can play a crucial role in constructing wild experiences within urban environments by drawing examples from science, engineering, and landscape research. At the core of this framework is the notion of "technodiversity" and an "ecology of machines," inspired by philosopher Yuk Hui's thinking. Technodiversity acknowledges the importance of diverse technological approaches rather than relying solely on optimization and efficiency-driven monocultural solutions. By embracing technodiversity, designers can gain a deeper understanding of environmental complexity and recognize alternative forms of intelligence beyond human capabilities. The purpose behind proposing this framework is not to provide a technical blueprint for building powerful machines but to foster landscape architects' understanding and awareness of environmental complexity while recognizing different forms of intelligence beyond human capabilities. This requires fundamental shifts in ontology and epistemology, viewing the environment as a hybrid of different frameworks, intentions, and goal functions. The paper concludes by emphasizing that cultivated wildness can lead to new possibilities and futures that are currently unimaginable.

• - Cultivated wildness at the intersection of landscape design and artificial intelligence
• - Moving beyond a singular understanding of wilderness
• - Cultivating new forms of wild places through interdisciplinary approaches
• - Framework for constructing wild places with intelligent machines
• - Cybernetic technologies and their potential contributions to the framework
• - Technodiversity as a parallel concept to biodiversity
• - Acknowledging "wildness" in machines
• - Rewilding urban environments beyond natural-looking landscapes or historical ecological patterns
• - Promoting autonomy of nonhuman species alongside machine agents in shaping landscapes
• - Role of intelligent machines in constructing wild experiences within urban environments
• - Technodiversity and an ecology of machines inspired by Yuk Hui's thinking
• - Embracing technodiversity for a deeper understanding of environmental complexity and alternative forms of intelligence
• - Fundamental shifts in ontology and epistemology for landscape architects' understanding and awareness
• - Cultivated wildness leading to new possibilities and futures.

This is a very complex topic, but I will try to explain it in a simple way for you. 1. People are using computers and machines to create new wild places that look like nature but are made by humans. 2. They want to go beyond just one idea of what wilderness is and create different kinds of wild places using different ways of thinking. 3. They are using different subjects and ideas together to make these new wild places, like science, art, and technology. 4. They have a plan for how to use intelligent machines to help them make these new wild places. 5. They also want to think about the diversity of machines and how they can be part of the natural world. Definitions- Cultivated: When people take care of something and help it grow. - Wildness: The quality or state of being wild or untamed. - Landscape design: Planning and creating outdoor spaces that look nice and work well for people. - Artificial intelligence: When computers or machines can do things that seem smart or human-like. - Interdisciplinary: Using ideas from different subjects or fields together. - Framework: A plan or structure for doing something. - Cybernetic technologies: Technologies that involve communication between humans and machines. - Biodiversity: The variety of living things in an area, like plants, animals, and insects. - Technodiversity: The variety of different types of machines or technology. - Autonomy: When something can make its own decisions without needing someone else

Cultivating Wildness: Exploring the Intersection of Landscape Design and Artificial Intelligence

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in exploring the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to shape our environment. This research paper looks at how AI can be used to cultivate wild places through interdisciplinary approaches in Environmental Humanities, Science and Technology Studies, Ecological Sciences, and Landscape Architecture. It proposes a framework for constructing wild places with intelligent machines that view them not as passive tools but as active agents capable of participating in co-production. Central to this framework is the concept of "technodiversity," which parallels biodiversity and emphasizes the recognition of diverse technological relationships with the environment.

The Concept Of Cultivated Wildness

The concept of cultivated wildness involves acknowledging “wildness” in machines. It goes beyond creating natural-looking landscapes or restoring historical ecological patterns by promoting autonomy for nonhuman species alongside machine agents as active co-conspirators in shaping landscapes. The idea is that intelligent machines can play a crucial role in constructing wild experiences within urban environments by drawing examples from science, engineering, and landscape research. At its core lies technodiversity – an acknowledgement of diverse technological approaches rather than relying solely on optimization and efficiency-driven monocultural solutions – inspired by philosopher Yuk Hui's thinking.

Rewilding Urban Environments

Designing urban wilds requires fundamental shifts in ontology and epistemology; viewing the environment as a hybrid of different frameworks, intentions, and goal functions rather than simply optimizing it for human use alone. Through technodiversity we can gain a deeper understanding of environmental complexity while recognizing different forms of intelligence beyond human capabilities such as sensing networks, artificial intelligence (AI), cyberphysical systems etc.. By embracing technodiversity designers can create new possibilities that are currently unimaginable when it comes to rewilding urban environments with AI technologies playing an important role here too.

Conclusion

This paper argues that contemporary landscape practices should move beyond a singular understanding wilderness towards cultivating new forms of wild places through interdisciplinary approaches such as Environmental Humanities, Science & Technology Studies etc.. It suggests that cultivated wildness involves acknowledging “wildness” in machines while promoting autonomy for nonhuman species alongside machine agents as active co-conspirators in shaping landscapes using AI technologies such as sensing networks & cyberphysical systems etc.. Ultimately this paper highlights how embracing technodiversity could lead to new possibilities when it comes to rewilding urban environments that are currently unimaginable today due to their complexity & diversity which require fundamental shifts both ontologically & epistemologically if they are ever going to be achieved successfully .