Fairness And Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, And Mitigation Strategies
AI-generated Key Points
- AI has made significant advancements in healthcare decision-making, medical diagnosis, and other domains.
- Concerns about the fairness and bias of AI systems have been raised, particularly in areas like healthcare, employment, criminal justice, and credit scoring.
- Biased AI systems can lead to unfair outcomes and perpetuate existing inequalities.
- The paper offers a comprehensive overview of fairness and bias in AI by reviewing sources of bias such as data, algorithm, and human decision biases.
- The societal impact of biased AI systems is assessed with a focus on the perpetuation of inequalities and the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes.
- The paper explores various proposed mitigation strategies for addressing AI bias while discussing their ethical considerations for implementation.
- Interdisciplinary collaboration is emphasized to ensure effectiveness in mitigating AI bias.
- Current approaches to mitigate AI bias are also provided including data pre-processing, model selection, and post-processing.
- Addressing bias in AI requires a holistic approach that involves diverse and representative datasets along with enhanced transparency and accountability in AI systems.
- Alternative AI paradigms that prioritize fairness and ethical considerations should also be explored.
- The importance of increasing diversity in training data collection methods to address biases at every stage of the AI pipeline is emphasized.
- Developing frameworks for responsible use of AI that include transparent documentation of training data and modeling decisions is essential along with diversifying teams involved in developing and evaluating AI systems to ensure fairness and justice.
- Future research should aim to establish ethical and legal frameworks governing AI systems while addressing privacy, transparency, accountability concerns as well as addressing biases in federated healthcare systems.
Authors: Emilio Ferrara
Abstract: The significant advancements in applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) to healthcare decision-making, medical diagnosis, and other domains have simultaneously raised concerns about the fairness and bias of AI systems, particularly in areas like healthcare, employment, criminal justice, and credit scoring. Such systems can lead to unfair outcomes and perpetuate existing inequalities. This survey paper offers a succinct, comprehensive overview of fairness and bias in AI, addressing their sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. We review sources of bias, such as data, algorithm, and human decision biases, and assess the societal impact of biased AI systems, focusing on the perpetuation of inequalities and the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes. We explore various proposed mitigation strategies, discussing the ethical considerations of their implementation and emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure effectiveness. Through a systematic literature review spanning multiple academic disciplines, we present definitions of AI bias and its different types, and discuss the negative impacts of AI bias on individuals and society. We also provide an overview of current approaches to mitigate AI bias, including data pre-processing, model selection, and post-processing. Addressing bias in AI requires a holistic approach, involving diverse and representative datasets, enhanced transparency and accountability in AI systems, and the exploration of alternative AI paradigms that prioritize fairness and ethical considerations. This survey contributes to the ongoing discussion on developing fair and unbiased AI systems by providing an overview of the sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies related to AI bias.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.