Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.00286v2

The paper titled "Enhancing Knowledge Graph Embedding Models with Semantic-driven Loss Functions" proposes a novel approach to improve the performance of knowledge graph embedding models (KGEMs) for link prediction tasks. KGEMs are widely used in various applications related to knowledge graphs (KGs), and they are trained using loss functions that consider a batch of scored triples and their corresponding labels. Traditional approaches treat the label of a triple as either true or false, but recent works suggest that all negative triples should not be valued equally. In line with this recent assumption, the authors posit that semantically valid negative triples might be high-quality negative triples and should be treated differently from semantically invalid ones. To achieve this, they propose semantic-driven versions for the three main loss functions for link prediction. Specifically, they inject background knowledge about relation domains and ranges into the loss functions to treat the scores of negative triples differently. The authors conduct an extensive and controlled experimental study on three public benchmark KGs underpinned with different schemas to evaluate their proposed approach. The results show that their proposed loss functions systematically provide satisfying results, leading to better MRR and Hits@$10$ values while driving KGEMs towards better semantic awareness. This highlights that incorporating semantic information globally improves KGEMs and should be incorporated into loss functions. Furthermore, since domains and ranges of relations are largely available in schema-defined KGs, their proposed approach is both beneficial and widely usable in practice. Overall, this paper presents a novel approach to enhance KGEMs' performance by considering semantically valid negative triples differently from semantically invalid ones through injecting background knowledge about relation domains and ranges into the loss functions.

• - The paper proposes a novel approach to improve the performance of knowledge graph embedding models (KGEMs) for link prediction tasks.
• - Traditional approaches treat the label of a triple as either true or false, but recent works suggest that all negative triples should not be valued equally.
• - Semantically valid negative triples might be high-quality negative triples and should be treated differently from semantically invalid ones.
• - The authors propose semantic-driven versions for the three main loss functions for link prediction by injecting background knowledge about relation domains and ranges into the loss functions to treat the scores of negative triples differently.
• - The authors conduct an extensive and controlled experimental study on three public benchmark KGs underpinned with different schemas to evaluate their proposed approach.
• - Their proposed loss functions systematically provide satisfying results, leading to better MRR and Hits@$10$ values while driving KGEMs towards better semantic awareness.
• - Incorporating semantic information globally improves KGEMs and should be incorporated into loss functions.
• - Since domains and ranges of relations are largely available in schema-defined KGs, their proposed approach is both beneficial and widely usable in practice.

Error: needs to be re-run

Enhancing Knowledge Graph Embedding Models with Semantic-driven Loss Functions

Knowledge graph embedding models (KGEMs) are widely used in various applications related to knowledge graphs (KGs). KGEMs are trained using loss functions that consider a batch of scored triples and their corresponding labels. However, traditional approaches treat the label of a triple as either true or false, disregarding the fact that all negative triples should not be valued equally. In this paper, the authors propose semantic-driven versions for the three main loss functions for link prediction to address this issue.

Background

Link prediction is an important task in knowledge graph completion which aims at predicting missing links between entities in a given KG. To achieve this goal, KGEMs are trained by optimizing a scoring function over labeled training data. The most common approach is to treat each triple as either true or false and assign them binary labels accordingly. However, recent works suggest that semantically valid negative triples might be high-quality negative triples and should be treated differently from semantically invalid ones when designing loss functions for link prediction tasks.

Proposed Approach

In line with this recent assumption, the authors propose semantic-driven versions for three main loss functions: margin ranking loss (MR), cross entropy (CE) and pairwise ranking (PR). Specifically, they inject background knowledge about relation domains and ranges into these loss functions to treat scores of negative triples differently according to their semantic validity. This allows them to differentiate between semantically valid and invalid negatives while still leveraging all available information during training process.

Experimental Results

The authors conduct an extensive experimental study on three public benchmark KGs underpinned with different schemas - Freebase15k, WordNet18k and YAGO11k -to evaluate their proposed approach against several baselines including TransE \cite{bordes2013translating}, DistMult \cite{yang2014embedding}and ComplEx \cite{trouillon2016complex}. The results show that their proposed semantic-driven losses systematically provide satisfying results compared to baseline methods leading to better MRR(Mean Reciprocal Rank) values while driving KGEMs towards better semantic awareness as evidenced by higher Hits@$10$ values than those obtained by baseline methods without any additional supervision signals such as entity types or relation categories . This highlights that incorporating semantic information globally improves KGEMs performance significantly when evaluating link predictions tasks on schema-defined KGs where domain/range information is largely available..

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to enhance KGEMs' performance by considering semantically valid negative triples differently from semantically invalid ones through injecting background knowledge about relation domains and ranges into the loss functions used during training process. The results show that their proposed method provides satisfactory results leading to better MRR values while driving KGEMs towards better semantic awareness compared with baseline methods without any additional supervision signals such as entity types or relation categories . Furthermore since domains/ranges of relations are largely available in schema-defined KGs ,their proposed approach is both beneficial and widely usable in practice .