Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2212.07861v2

The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 had a significant impact on the polarization of public opinion regarding NATO membership in Finland. Prior to the invasion, Finnish social media discussions on NATO were polarized along left-right partisan lines, with three distinct user groups identified: pro-NATO, left-wing anti-NATO, and conspiracy-charged anti-NATO. However, following the invasion there was a rapid convergence of opinion among these groups leading to depolarization and eventually resulting in Finland applying for NATO membership. Through an analysis of retweeting patterns on Finnish Twitter it was found that the left-wing anti-NATO group members broke out of their retweeting bubble and connected with the pro-NATO group despite their difference in partisanship. However, the conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group mostly remained a separate cluster. Content analysis revealed that the left-wing anti-NATO group and the pro-NATO group were likely bridged by a shared condemnation of Russia's actions and shared democratic norms. This study provides evidence that an external threat can bridge partisan divides in issues linked to the threat. However, groups upheld by conspiracy theories and disinformation may persist even under dramatic external threats. The findings suggest that depolarization can occur when there is a shared understanding of democratic values and a common enemy threatening those values. This has important implications for policymakers seeking to address polarization within their societies.

• - Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 impacted polarization of public opinion regarding NATO membership in Finland
• - Prior to invasion, Finnish social media discussions on NATO were polarized along left-right partisan lines with three distinct user groups identified: pro-NATO, left-wing anti-NATO, and conspiracy-charged anti-NATO
• - Following the invasion, there was a rapid convergence of opinion among these groups leading to depolarization and eventually resulting in Finland applying for NATO membership
• - Left-wing anti-NATO group members broke out of their retweeting bubble and connected with the pro-NATO group despite their difference in partisanship
• - Conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group mostly remained a separate cluster
• - Content analysis revealed that left-wing anti-NATO group and pro-NATO group were likely bridged by shared condemnation of Russia's actions and shared democratic norms
• - External threat can bridge partisan divides in issues linked to the threat
• - Groups upheld by conspiracy theories and disinformation may persist even under dramatic external threats
• - Depolarization can occur when there is a shared understanding of democratic values and a common enemy threatening those values
• - Findings have important implications for policymakers seeking to address polarization within their societies

Summary: Finland had different opinions about joining NATO before Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Some people were for it, some were against it, and some believed in conspiracy theories. After the invasion, most people agreed that Finland should join NATO to protect themselves from Russia. Even people who didn't agree with each other before started working together because they all wanted to stop Russia. However, some people still believed in conspiracy theories and didn't change their minds. Definitions: - Invasion: when one country's army goes into another country without permission - Polarization: when people have very different opinions and don't want to work together - Partisan: when someone supports a particular political party or group - Depolarization: when people start agreeing more and working together despite their differences - Condemnation: when someone strongly disagrees with something and says it's wrong

The Impact of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine on NATO Membership in Finland

In February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine, and this event had a significant impact on public opinion regarding NATO membership in Finland. Prior to the invasion, Finnish social media discussions about NATO were polarized along left-right partisan lines with three distinct user groups identified: pro-NATO, left-wing anti-NATO, and conspiracy-charged anti-NATO. However, following the invasion there was a rapid convergence of opinion among these groups leading to depolarization and eventually resulting in Finland applying for NATO membership.

Analysis of Retweeting Patterns on Finnish Twitter

An analysis of retweeting patterns on Finnish Twitter revealed that members of the left-wing anti-NATO group broke out of their retweeting bubble and connected with the pro-NATO group despite their difference in partisanship. However, members from the conspiracy charged anti-NATO group mostly remained a separate cluster. Content analysis showed that both groups were likely bridged by a shared condemnation of Russia's actions and shared democratic norms.

Implications for Policymakers

This study provides evidence that an external threat can bridge partisan divides in issues linked to the threat. However, groups upheld by conspiracy theories and disinformation may persist even under dramatic external threats. The findings suggest that depolarization can occur when there is a shared understanding of democratic values and a common enemy threatening those values. This has important implications for policymakers seeking to address polarization within their societies as it suggests strategies they could use to reduce polarization through fostering shared understandings around democratic values while also addressing external threats which could be used as rallying points against political divisions within society.