In their paper titled "What Do I Need to Design for Co-Design? Supporting Co-design as a Designerly Practice," authors Shruthi Sai Chivukula and Colin M Gray explore the knowledge required by designers to effectively create co-design experiences. While co-design practices have been utilized for many years to facilitate participatory engagement in design work, there is a lack of comprehensive descriptions regarding the knowledge that guides designers in designing these experiences. To address this gap, the authors adopt a co/auto-ethnographic and Research-through-Design approach, reflecting on their design decisions, outcomes, and challenges related to two virtual co-design workshops. The authors propose four multi-dimensional facets and three roles that should be considered when designing co-design experiences. The four facets include Rhythms of Engagement, Material Engagement, Ludic Engagement, and Conceptual Achievement. These facets provide a framework for understanding the different dimensions involved in creating meaningful co-design experiences. Additionally, the three roles identified are designer, researcher, and facilitator, highlighting the diverse perspectives and responsibilities necessary for successful co-design. To illustrate their proposed framework, Chivukula and Gray provide examples from their own experiences in conducting virtual co-design workshops. Through these examples, they develop intermediate-level knowledge that can support future research and design efforts in the field of co-design. By framing co-design as a designerly practice, the authors emphasize its importance as a distinct area of expertise within design. Overall, this paper contributes valuable insights into the knowledge required by designers to effectively design co-design experiences. The proposed framework provides a structured approach for considering various aspects of engagement and achievement in co-design processes. This research has implications for both practitioners and researchers interested in enhancing participatory engagement through effective co-design practices.
- - Lack of comprehensive descriptions regarding the knowledge that guides designers in designing co-design experiences
- - Adoption of co/auto-ethnographic and Research-through-Design approach
- - Four multi-dimensional facets: Rhythms of Engagement, Material Engagement, Ludic Engagement, and Conceptual Achievement
- - Three roles: designer, researcher, and facilitator
- - Examples from virtual co-design workshops to illustrate the proposed framework
- - Development of intermediate-level knowledge to support future research and design efforts in co-design
- - Framing co-design as a designerly practice
- - Contribution of valuable insights into the knowledge required by designers for effective co-design experiences
- - Structured approach for considering aspects of engagement and achievement in co-design processes.
- - Implications for practitioners and researchers interested in enhancing participatory engagement through effective co-design practices.
The key points are about how designers create things together with other people. They use different ways to understand what people want and need. There are four important parts of this process: how people get involved, what materials they use, how they have fun, and what ideas they come up with. There are three important roles: the designer who makes things, the researcher who studies and learns from the process, and the facilitator who helps everyone work together. They give examples of using computers to do this kind of designing. This helps us learn more about how to do it better in the future. It also shows that designing is an important skill for everyone to have."
Definitions- Comprehensive: including everything or nearly everything
- Ethnographic: studying people and cultures
- Facets: different parts or aspects
- Ludic: related to playfulness or having fun
- Conceptual: related to ideas or thoughts
- Intermediate-level knowledge: knowledge that is not too easy but also not too hard
What Do I Need to Design for Co-Design? Supporting Co-design as a Designerly Practice
In their paper titled "What Do I Need to Design for Co-Design? Supporting Co-design as a Designerly Practice," authors Shruthi Sai Chivukula and Colin M Gray explore the knowledge required by designers to effectively create co-design experiences. While co-design practices have been utilized for many years to facilitate participatory engagement in design work, there is a lack of comprehensive descriptions regarding the knowledge that guides designers in designing these experiences. To address this gap, the authors adopt a co/auto-ethnographic and Research-through-Design approach, reflecting on their design decisions, outcomes, and challenges related to two virtual co-design workshops.
Four Facets of Engagement
The authors propose four multi-dimensional facets and three roles that should be considered when designing co-design experiences. The four facets include Rhythms of Engagement, Material Engagement, Ludic Engagement, and Conceptual Achievement. These facets provide a framework for understanding the different dimensions involved in creating meaningful co-design experiences.
Rhythms of Engagement refers to how participants interact with each other during the process of collaboration; it includes aspects such as pacing and timing of activities or conversations between participants. Material Engagement involves how physical materials are used within the context of collaboration; this could include tangible objects or digital tools used during the process. Ludic Engagement focuses on playful elements that can be incorporated into collaborative processes; this could include games or creative activities designed to engage participants in meaningful ways. Finally, Conceptual Achievement looks at how ideas are generated through collaboration; this includes exploring new concepts or refining existing ones through collective problem solving efforts.
Three Roles
In addition to these four facets, Chivukula and Gray identify three distinct roles necessary for successful co-design: designer, researcher, and facilitator. The designer’s role is focused on developing an overall vision for the project while also considering practical considerations such as budgeting or scheduling constraints; they must also ensure that all stakeholders’ needs are taken into account throughout the entire process from conception through implementation stages. The researcher’s role is centered around collecting data about participant interactions during collaborative sessions which can then be analyzed in order to inform future designs; they must also consider ethical implications associated with research methods employed during data collection efforts (e.g., informed consent). Finally, facilitators play an important role in ensuring smooth transitions between activities throughout collaborative sessions while also providing support when needed (e.g., troubleshooting technical issues). By highlighting these diverse perspectives and responsibilities necessary for successful co-design processes, Chivukula & Gray emphasize its importance as a distinct area of expertise within design practice more broadly speaking than just user experience (UX) design alone may suggest otherwise..
Examples from Virtual Workshops
To illustrate their proposed framework further , Chivukula & Gray provide examples from their own experiences conducting virtual workshops using Zoom meetings software . Through these examples , they develop intermediate - level knowledge that can support future research and design efforts in the field of co - design . For example , one workshop was structured around “rhythmic engagements” where participants were asked questions about what topics interested them most ; based on responses , small groups were formed so individuals could discuss those topics further . This type of activity allowed participants to become familiar with each other quickly while still engaging deeply with content being discussed . Additionally , another workshop focused on material engagement included tasks like drawing pictures together online using shared whiteboards ; this enabled participants not only collaborate but also produce tangible artifacts which could be referenced later if needed . By incorporating both ludic elements (games) alongside conceptual achievement tasks (brainstorming), both types of engagement were encouraged among all members present .
Implications
Overall , this paper contributes valuable insights into the knowledge required by designers to effectively design co - design experiences . The proposed framework provides a structured approach for considering various aspects of engagement and achievement in co - design processes which has implications for both practitioners and researchers interested in enhancing participatory engagement through effective practices . As technology continues advancing rapidly over time , it will become increasingly important for designers working with emerging technologies understand how best leverage them towards creating meaningful collaborations between people who would otherwise remain disconnected due too geographical distance or other factors beyond control