Vanishing 2-Qubit Gates with Non-Simplification ZX-Rules

AI-generated keywords: Quantum Computing Circuit Optimization ZX-calculus Graph Theory Local Complementation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Circuit optimization is crucial in quantum computing to reduce the number of gates required for a given algorithm.
  • Traditional optimization techniques involve optimizing circuits at the gate level, which can be time-consuming and challenging.
  • The ZX-calculus allows circuits to be translated into graphical representations known as ZX-diagrams, which can be simplified using specific rules of the calculus.
  • Current extraction procedures for obtaining a simplified circuit from a ZX-diagram can lead to an increase in the number of 2-qubit gates required.
  • Krueger and Kissinger propose a new strategy for optimizing quantum circuits using non-simplification rewrite rules based on graph-theoretic notions of local complementation and pivoting.
  • Their approach generates local variants of a simplified ZX-diagram using these congruences and explores their space with simulated annealing and genetic algorithms to obtain a simplified circuit with fewer 2-qubit gates.
  • Their method outperforms state-of-the-art optimization techniques for low-qubit circuits (<10) on randomly generated circuits and consistently reduces overall circuit complexity by an additional ~15–30% and eliminates up to 46% of 2-qubit gates compared to off-the-shelf methods on previously reported benchmark circuits with up to 14 qubits.
  • This work highlights how leveraging mathematical concepts from graph theory can provide novel solutions for complex problems in quantum computing.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ryan Krueger

arXiv: 2209.06874v1 - DOI (quant-ph)
MSc Dissertation, supervised by Aleks Kissinger

Abstract: Traditional quantum circuit optimization is performed directly at the circuit level. Alternatively, a quantum circuit can be translated to a ZX-diagram which can be simplified using the rules of the ZX-calculus, after which a simplified circuit can be extracted. However, the best-known extraction procedures can drastically increase the number of 2-qubit gates. In this work, we take advantage of the fact that local changes in a ZX-diagram can drastically affect the complexity of the extracted circuit. We use a pair of congruences (i.e., non-simplification rewrite rules) based on the graph-theoretic notions of local complementation and pivoting to generate local variants of a simplified ZX-diagram. We explore the space of equivalent ZX-diagrams generated by these congruences using simulated annealing and genetic algorithms to obtain a simplified circuit with fewer 2-qubit gates. On randomly generated circuits, our method can outperform state-of-the-art optimization techniques for low-qubit (<10) circuits. On a set of previously reported benchmark circuits with <=14 qubits, our method outperforms off-the-shelf methods in 87% of cases, consistently reducing overall circuit complexity by an additional ~15-30% and eliminating up to 46% of 2-qubit gates. These preliminary results serve as a proof-of-concept for a new circuit optimization strategy in the ZX-calculus.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Sep. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2209.06874v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of quantum computing, circuit optimization is a crucial task that aims to reduce the number of gates required to implement a given quantum algorithm. Traditional optimization techniques involve directly optimizing the circuit at the gate level, which can be a time-consuming and challenging process. Alternatively, researchers have developed the ZX-calculus, which allows circuits to be translated into graphical representations known as ZX-diagrams. These diagrams can then be simplified using specific rules of the calculus, resulting in a simplified circuit. However, current extraction procedures for obtaining a simplified circuit from a ZX-diagram can lead to an increase in the number of 2-qubit gates required. In this work by Ryan Krueger and Aleks Kissinger, they propose a new strategy for optimizing quantum circuits using non-simplification rewrite rules based on graph-theoretic notions of local complementation and pivoting. By generating local variants of a simplified ZX-diagram using these congruences and exploring their space with simulated annealing and genetic algorithms, they aim to obtain a simplified circuit with fewer 2-qubit gates. Their approach takes advantage of the fact that local changes in a ZX-diagram can significantly affect the complexity of the extracted circuit. The authors demonstrate that their method outperforms state-of-the-art optimization techniques for low-qubit circuits (<10) on randomly generated circuits. Furthermore, on previously reported benchmark circuits with up to 14 qubits, their method consistently reduces overall circuit complexity by an additional ~15–30% and eliminates up to 46% of 2-qubit gates compared to off-the shelf methods. These preliminary results serve as proof–of–concept for a new optimization strategy in the ZX–calculus that could potentially lead to significant improvements in quantum circuit design. Overall, this work highlights how leveraging mathematical concepts from graph theory can provide novel solutions for complex problems in quantum computing.
Created on 12 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.