FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminators
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper introduces a method called Future Discriminators for Generation (FUDGE) for controlled text generation.
- FUDGE works with an existing text generation model and allows conditioning on specific attributes.
- FUDGE uses an attribute predictor to adjust the original probabilities of the text generation model based on a partial sequence.
- FUDGE models terms corresponding to a Bayesian decomposition of the conditional distribution, enabling fine-grained control over attributes like formality.
- FUDGE can easily compose predictors for multiple desired attributes, making it versatile in handling various control tasks.
- FUDGE is evaluated on three tasks: couplet completion in poetry, topic control in language generation, and formality change in machine translation.
- FUDGE demonstrates improvements compared to baseline models in all three tasks.
- Overall, FUDGE provides a flexible and effective approach for controlled text generation by leveraging attribute predictors and adjusting probabilities.
Authors: Kevin Yang, Dan Klein
Abstract: We propose Future Discriminators for Generation (FUDGE), a flexible and modular method for controlled text generation. Given a pre-existing model G for generating text from a distribution of interest, FUDGE enables conditioning on a desired attribute a (for example, formality) while requiring access only to G's output logits. FUDGE learns an attribute predictor operating on a partial sequence, and uses this predictor's outputs to adjust G's original probabilities. We show that FUDGE models terms corresponding to a Bayesian decomposition of the conditional distribution of G given attribute a. Moreover, FUDGE can easily compose predictors for multiple desired attributes. We evaluate FUDGE on three tasks -- couplet completion in poetry, topic control in language generation, and formality change in machine translation -- and observe gains in all three tasks.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.