PAMELI: A Meta-Algorithm for Computationally Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization Problems
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper presents an algorithm for solving computationally expensive multi-objective optimization problems
- The algorithm uses surrogate models to evaluate only approximately Pareto-optimal solutions
- It performs a meta-search to identify optimal surrogate models and navigation strategies
- The adaptive search strategy allows the algorithm to adjust its approach based on new information
- Experimental comparison with a state-of-the-art surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithm shows the effectiveness of the proposed PAMELI algorithm
- The algorithm efficiently finds approximate Pareto-optimal solutions
- It combines surrogate modeling with adaptive search strategies
- The results highlight its superiority over existing approaches
- It has potential in domains with limited or costly computational resources.
Authors: Santiago Cuervo, Miguel Melgarejo, Angie Blanco-Cañon, Laura Reyes-Fajardo, Sergio Rojas-Galeano
Abstract: We present an algorithm for multi-objective optimization of computationally expensive problems. The proposed algorithm is based on solving a set of surrogate problems defined by models of the real one, so that only solutions estimated to be approximately Pareto-optimal are evaluated using the real expensive functions. Aside of the search for solutions, our algorithm also performs a meta-search for optimal surrogate models and navigation strategies for the optimization landscape, therefore adapting the search strategy for solutions to the problem as new information about it is obtained. The competitiveness of our approach is demonstrated by an experimental comparison with one state-of-the-art surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithm on a set of benchmark problems.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.