Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2101.06125v1

This article presents the findings of a study conducted by Ana Guerberof Arenas and Antonio Toral on the impact of post-editing and machine translation on creativity and reading experience. The study involved translating a fictional story from English into Catalan using three modalities: machine-translated (MT), post-edited (MTPE), and translated without aid (HT). Each translation was analyzed to assess its level of creativity. Afterward, a group of 88 Catalan participants read the story in one of the three assigned modalities and completed a survey. The results revealed that translations done without any aid (HT) scored higher in terms of creativity compared to both post-edited (MTPE) and machine-translated (MT) versions. Additionally, HT translations ranked higher in narrative engagement and translation reception, while MTPE translations were marginally higher in enjoyment. No statistically significant differences were found between HT and MTPE translations in any category, whereas MT translations showed significant differences across all variables tested. Based on these findings, the authors concluded that professional translators' intervention in the translation process, particularly when working without any aid, resulted in higher levels of creativity. They also hypothesized that creativity in translation could be a crucial factor for enhancing reading engagement and the reception of translated literary texts. Overall, this study highlights the importance of human involvement and creative input in translation processes to achieve better quality outcomes that resonate with readers.

• - Study conducted by Ana Guerberof Arenas and Antonio Toral on impact of post-editing and machine translation on creativity and reading experience
• - Translated a fictional story from English into Catalan using three modalities: machine-translated (MT), post-edited (MTPE), and translated without aid (HT)
• - Translations done without any aid (HT) scored higher in creativity compared to MTPE and MT versions
• - HT translations ranked higher in narrative engagement and translation reception, while MTPE translations were marginally higher in enjoyment
• - No statistically significant differences between HT and MTPE translations in any category, significant differences found with MT translations
• - Professional translators' intervention resulted in higher levels of creativity
• - Creativity in translation could enhance reading engagement and reception of translated literary texts
• - Importance of human involvement and creative input in translation processes for better quality outcomes

A study was done to see how using machines and humans to translate stories affects creativity and reading experience. They translated a made-up story from English to Catalan in three different ways: using a machine, editing the machine's translation, and translating without any help. The translations without any help were more creative than the ones with editing or just using the machine. The translations without any help also had better storytelling and were easier to understand, while the edited ones were slightly more enjoyable. There weren't big differences between the edited translations and the ones without any help, but there were big differences with just using the machine. When professional translators helped, the translations became even more creative. Being creative when translating can make people enjoy reading translated stories more, so it's important for humans to be involved in the translation process."

The Impact of Post-Editing and Machine Translation on Creativity and Reading Experience

Recent advances in machine translation (MT) technology have made it possible to quickly produce translations with minimal human intervention. However, the quality of these translations is often lower than that of human-translated texts due to the lack of creative input. To better understand how post-editing and MT affect creativity and reading experience, Ana Guerberof Arenas and Antonio Toral conducted a study involving 88 Catalan participants.

Methodology

The authors translated a fictional story from English into Catalan using three modalities: machine-translated (MT), post-edited (MTPE), and translated without aid (HT). Each translation was then analyzed for its level of creativity. Afterward, the participants were randomly assigned one of the three versions to read before completing a survey about their reading experience.

Results

The results revealed that translations done without any aid (HT) scored higher in terms of creativity compared to both post-edited (MTPE) and machine-translated (MT) versions. Additionally, HT translations ranked higher in narrative engagement and translation reception, while MTPE translations were marginally higher in enjoyment. No statistically significant differences were found between HT and MTPE translations in any category, whereas MT translations showed significant differences across all variables tested.

Conclusion

Based on these findings, the authors concluded that professional translators' intervention in the translation process, particularly when working without any aid, resulted in higher levels of creativity. They also hypothesized that creativity in translation could be a crucial factor for enhancing reading engagement and the reception of translated literary texts. Overall, this study highlights the importance of human involvement and creative input in translation processes to achieve better quality outcomes that resonate with readers.