Single-bubble dynamics in histotripsy and high-amplitude ultrasound: Modeling and validation
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Lack of experimental data for bubble dynamics under a well-characterized driving pressure has limited the study of single-bubble dynamics in histotripsy and high-amplitude ultrasound.
- Recent measurements of radius vs. time for single, spherical histotripsy-nucleated bubbles in water have enabled the validation and comparison of various modeling approaches.
- A strategy for inferring an analytic representation of histotripsy waveforms directly from experimental data is presented in this study.
- The calculated validation metric obtained for each model applied to 88 experimental data sets shows minimal distinction among the modeling approaches considered (less than 1%).
- The proposed strategy combined with simple models accurately represent single-bubble dynamics in histotripsy, including at and near the maximum bubble radius while minimizing parametric uncertainty and computational resource demands.
- Remaining sources of parametric and model-based uncertainty are discussed.
Authors: Lauren Mancia, Mauro Rodriguez, Jonathan Sukovich, Zhen Xu, Eric Johnsen
Abstract: A variety of approaches have been used to model the dynamics of a single, isolated bubble nucleated by a microsecond length high-amplitude ultrasound pulse (e.g., a histotripsy pulse). Until recently, the lack of single--bubble experimental radius vs. time data for bubble dynamics under a well-characterized driving pressure has limited model validation efforts. This study uses radius vs. time measurements of single, spherical histotripsy-nucleated bubbles in water [Wilson et al., Phys. Rev. E, 2019, 99, 043103] to quantitatively compare and validate a variety of bubble dynamics modeling approaches, including compressible and incompressible models as well as different thermal models. A strategy for inferring an analytic representation of histotripsy waveforms directly from experimental radius vs. time and cavitation threshold data is presented. We compare distributions of a calculated validation metric obtained for each model applied to $88$ experimental data sets. There is minimal distinction ($< 1\%$) among the modeling approaches for compressibility and thermal effects considered in this study. These results suggest that our proposed strategy to infer the waveform, combined with simple models minimizing parametric uncertainty and computational resource demands accurately represent single-bubble dynamics in histotripsy, including at and near the maximum bubble radius. Remaining sources of parametric and model-based uncertainty are discussed.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.