Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2005.12505v1

In their paper titled "How Many Freemasons Are There? The Consensus Voting Mechanism in Metric Spaces," Mashbat Suzuki and Adrian Vetta explore the evolution of social groups when admission is determined through consensus or unanimity voting. In this scenario, two candidates apply for membership at each time period, and a candidate is selected only if all current group members agree. The authors use the spatial theory of voting, where group members and candidates are located in a metric space, and each member votes for their closest (most similar) candidate. The focus of this study is on the expected cardinality of the group after T time periods. To evaluate this, the authors examine the geometry inherent in dynamic consensus voting over a metric space. They develop a set of techniques for lower bounding and upper bounding the expected cardinality of a group, specializing these methods for two-dimensional metric spaces. For the unit ball, they find that the expected cardinality of the group after T time periods is proportional to T raised to 1/8 power. However, for the unit square, they find that while the expected cardinality is at least proportional to ln(T), it is at most proportional to ln(T) multiplied by ln(ln(T)). This contrast between the unit ball and unit square highlights how different geometric shapes can affect social dynamics. Overall, this paper provides insights into how consensus or unanimity voting can impact social groups' evolution in metric spaces. The techniques developed here could have implications beyond social dynamics and could be applied to other fields where spatial theory plays an important role.

• - The paper explores the evolution of social groups when admission is determined through consensus or unanimity voting.
• - Two candidates apply for membership at each time period, and a candidate is selected only if all current group members agree.
• - The authors use the spatial theory of voting, where group members and candidates are located in a metric space, and each member votes for their closest (most similar) candidate.
• - The expected cardinality of the group after T time periods is the focus of this study.
• - The authors examine the geometry inherent in dynamic consensus voting over a metric space to evaluate this.
• - They develop techniques for lower bounding and upper bounding the expected cardinality of a group, specializing these methods for two-dimensional metric spaces.
• - For the unit ball, they find that the expected cardinality of the group after T time periods is proportional to T raised to 1/8 power.
• - For the unit square, they find that while the expected cardinality is at least proportional to ln(T), it is at most proportional to ln(T) multiplied by ln(ln(T)).
• - This contrast between the unit ball and unit square highlights how different geometric shapes can affect social dynamics.
• - The paper provides insights into how consensus or unanimity voting can impact social groups' evolution in metric spaces.
• - The techniques developed here could have implications beyond social dynamics and could be applied to other fields where spatial theory plays an important role.

The paper talks about how groups of people choose new members. They use a special way of voting where everyone has to agree for someone to be chosen. The authors use math to study this and look at how the group changes over time. They found that different shapes can affect how the group grows. This information can help us understand how groups work in different situations. Definitions: - Evolution: the process of something changing or developing over time - Social groups: a group of people who interact with each other and share common interests or characteristics - Consensus: when everyone in a group agrees on something - Metric space: a mathematical concept that helps measure distance between things - Cardinality: the number of elements in a set - Geometry: the branch of mathematics that deals with shapes, sizes, and positions of objects - Upper bounding and lower bounding: methods used to estimate values within a certain range

Exploring the Evolution of Social Groups with Consensus Voting

In their paper titled "How Many Freemasons Are There? The Consensus Voting Mechanism in Metric Spaces," Mashbat Suzuki and Adrian Vetta explore the evolution of social groups when admission is determined through consensus or unanimity voting. This type of voting requires that all current group members agree before a candidate can be accepted into the group. To evaluate this, they examine the geometry inherent in dynamic consensus voting over a metric space. In this article, we will discuss how different geometric shapes can affect social dynamics and provide insights into how consensus or unanimity voting can impact social groups' evolution in metric spaces.

The Spatial Theory of Voting

The authors use the spatial theory of voting to model how group members and candidates are located in a metric space, and each member votes for their closest (most similar) candidate. They assume that two candidates apply for membership at each time period, and focus on evaluating the expected cardinality of the group after T time periods.

Lower Bounding & Upper Bounding Techniques

To evaluate this expected cardinality, they develop a set of techniques for lower bounding and upper bounding it. These methods are specialized for two-dimensional metric spaces such as unit balls or unit squares. For example, they find that when using a unit ball as their metric space, the expected cardinality is proportional to T raised to 1/8 power; however, when using a unit square as their metric space, while it is still at least proportional to ln(T), it is at most proportional to ln(T) multiplied by ln(ln(T)). This contrast between these two shapes highlights how different geometric shapes can affect social dynamics within these types of groups.

Implications Beyond Social Dynamics

Overall, this paper provides useful insights into how consensus or unanimity voting can impact social groups' evolution in metric spaces. The techniques developed here could have implications beyond social dynamics and could be applied to other fields where spatial theory plays an important role - such as economics or politics - allowing us to better understand how certain decisions may influence outcomes over time based on various geometries involved in those scenarios.