Best of Both Worlds: AutoML Codesign of a CNN and its Hardware Accelerator
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Neural architecture search (NAS) is a technique for designing CNNs that outperform human-designed models in accuracy.
- NAS-designed CNNs often have complex topologies, making it difficult to develop custom hardware accelerators for them.
- The authors propose Codesign-NAS, which automates the process of hardware-CNN codesign using NAS.
- Codesign-NAS aims to find the optimal model-accelerator pair that improves both accuracy and efficiency.
- The authors define the multiobjective optimization problem of Codesign-NAS and explore different strategies for navigating the codesign search space.
- They conduct experiments on CIFAR-10 image classification and enumerate nearly 4 billion model-accelerator pairs to identify the Pareto frontier within this vast search space.
- Three reinforcement-learning-based search strategies are employed to evaluate their approach.
- Results show a 1.3% improvement in CIFAR-100 classification accuracy compared to ResNet with its most optimal hardware accelerator, along with a 41% increase in performance/area.
- These improvements are achieved with just around 1000 GPU-hours of running Codesign-NAS.
- This study presents a novel approach for automating hardware-CNN codesign using NAS, highlighting its potential in enhancing both accuracy and efficiency while reducing manual effort.
Authors: Mohamed S. Abdelfattah, Łukasz Dudziak, Thomas Chau, Royson Lee, Hyeji Kim, Nicholas D. Lane
Abstract: Neural architecture search (NAS) has been very successful at outperforming human-designed convolutional neural networks (CNN) in accuracy, and when hardware information is present, latency as well. However, NAS-designed CNNs typically have a complicated topology, therefore, it may be difficult to design a custom hardware (HW) accelerator for such CNNs. We automate HW-CNN codesign using NAS by including parameters from both the CNN model and the HW accelerator, and we jointly search for the best model-accelerator pair that boosts accuracy and efficiency. We call this Codesign-NAS. In this paper we focus on defining the Codesign-NAS multiobjective optimization problem, demonstrating its effectiveness, and exploring different ways of navigating the codesign search space. For CIFAR-10 image classification, we enumerate close to 4 billion model-accelerator pairs, and find the Pareto frontier within that large search space. This allows us to evaluate three different reinforcement-learning-based search strategies. Finally, compared to ResNet on its most optimal HW accelerator from within our HW design space, we improve on CIFAR-100 classification accuracy by 1.3% while simultaneously increasing performance/area by 41% in just~1000 GPU-hours of running Codesign-NAS.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.