Towards High Performance, Portability, and Productivity: Lightweight Augmented Neural Networks for Performance Prediction

Authors: Ajitesh Srivastava (University of Southern California), Naifeng Zhang (University of Southern California), Rajgopal Kannan (US Army Research Lab-West), Viktor K. Prasanna (University of Southern California)

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2003.07497v2

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Abstract: Writing high-performance code requires significant expertise in the programming language, compiler optimizations, and hardware knowledge. This often leads to poor productivity and portability and is inconvenient for a non-programmer domain-specialist such as a Physicist. More desirable is a high-level language where the domain-specialist simply specifies the workload in terms of high-level operations (e.g., matrix-multiply(A, B)), and the compiler identifies the best implementation fully utilizing the heterogeneous platform. For creating a compiler that supports productivity, portability, and performance simultaneously, it is crucial to predict the performance of various available implementations (variants) of the dominant operations (kernels) contained in the workload on various hardware to decide (a) which variant should be chosen for each kernel in the workload, and (b) on which hardware resource the variant should run. To enable the performance prediction, we propose lightweight augmented neural networks for arbitrary combinations of kernel-variant-hardware. A key innovation is utilizing the mathematical complexity of the kernels as a feature to achieve higher accuracy. These models are compact to reduce training time and fast inference during compile-time and run-time. Using models with less than 75 parameters, and only 250 training data instances, we are able to obtain a low MAPE of 3%, significantly outperforming traditional feed-forward neural networks on 48 kernel-variant-hardware combinations. We further demonstrate that our variant-selection approach can be used in Halide implementations to obtain up to 1.7x speedup over Halide's auto-scheduler.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Mar. 2020

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.