A Practical Method for Solving Contextual Bandit Problems Using Decision Trees
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The contextual multi-armed bandit problem has efficient algorithms with strong theoretical guarantees
- Applying these algorithms in practice is challenging due to the need for domain expertise to build appropriate features and tune their parameters
- Adam N. Elmachtoub, Ryan McNellis, Sechan Oh, and Marek Petrik proposed a new method that is simple and practical
- This method relies on decision trees to model the context-reward relationship as they are non-parametric and interpretable
- A bootstrapping approach is used to guide the exploration-exploitation trade-off which abstracts Thompson sampling to non-Bayesian settings
- The algorithm outperforms existing methods while being simpler to implement and requiring less domain expertise
- This paper presents a practical solution for solving contextual bandit problems using decision trees that can be applied with ease by practitioners without extensive knowledge of machine learning or statistics.
Authors: Adam N. Elmachtoub, Ryan McNellis, Sechan Oh, Marek Petrik
Abstract: Many efficient algorithms with strong theoretical guarantees have been proposed for the contextual multi-armed bandit problem. However, applying these algorithms in practice can be difficult because they require domain expertise to build appropriate features and to tune their parameters. We propose a new method for the contextual bandit problem that is simple, practical, and can be applied with little or no domain expertise. Our algorithm relies on decision trees to model the context-reward relationship. Decision trees are non-parametric, interpretable, and work well without hand-crafted features. To guide the exploration-exploitation trade-off, we use a bootstrapping approach which abstracts Thompson sampling to non-Bayesian settings. We also discuss several computational heuristics and demonstrate the performance of our method on several datasets.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.