Predicting the intensity mapping signal for multi-$J$ CO lines
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors Natalie Mashian, Amiel Sternberg, and Abraham Loeb present a novel approach to estimating the intensity mapping signal of CO rotational lines during the Epoch of Reionization (EoR).
- Methodology based on large velocity gradient (LVG) modeling considers parameters such as gas kinetic temperature, volume density, velocity gradient, molecular abundance, and column density.
- Connection established between LVG parameters and global properties of host galaxies, focusing on star formation rate (SFR) and SFR surface density.
- Incorporation of empirically derived SFR-M relation for high redshift galaxies enables determination of specific intensity of CO rotational transitions as functions of host halo mass M and redshift z.
- Predictions indicate mean CO(1-0) brightness temperature ranging from approximately 1 μK at z = 6 to about 0.2 μK at z = 10 under certain assumptions about duty cycles for star formation and CO luminous activity.
- Higher rotational levels exhibit strong CO emission signals with average brightness temperatures around 0.3 μK and 0.1 μK for the CO J = 10->9 transition at redshifts z = 6 and z = 10 respectively.
- When duty cycles are set at unity, estimated CO(1-0) brightness temperature decreases to approximately 0.6 μK at z = 6 and around 0.03 μK at z =10.
- Reduction in signal strengths for higher J lines may decrease the likelihood of detecting these transitions with high significance in certain models proposed by the authors.
- Study provides valuable insights into predicting intensity mapping signals for multi-J CO lines during EoR by leveraging LVG modeling techniques and linking them to key galaxy properties like SFR and halo mass.
Authors: Natalie Mashian, Amiel Sternberg, Abraham Loeb
Abstract: We present a novel approach to estimating the intensity mapping signal of any CO rotational line emitted during the Epoch of Reionization (EoR). Our approach is based on large velocity gradient (LVG) modeling, a radiative transfer modeling technique that generates the full CO spectral line energy distribution (SLED) for a specified gas kinetic temperature, volume density, velocity gradient, molecular abundance, and column density. These parameters, which drive the physics of CO transitions and ultimately dictate the shape and amplitude of the CO SLED, can be linked to the global properties of the host galaxy, mainly the star formation rate (SFR) and the SFR surface density. By further employing an empirically derived SFR-M relation for high redshift galaxies, we can express the LVG parameters, and thus the specific intensity of any CO rotational transition, as functions of the host halo mass M and redshift z. Integrating over the range of halo masses expected to host CO-luminous galaxies, i.e. M >= 10^8 M{_\odot}, we predict a mean CO(1-0) brightness temperature ranging from ~1 {\mu}K at z = 6 to ~ 0.2 {\mu}K at z = 10 in the case where the duty cycles of star formation and CO luminous activity are assumed to be 0.1 (f_{UV} = f_{duty} = 0.1). In this model, the CO emission signal remains strong for higher rotational levels, with < T_{CO} > ~ 0.3 and 0.1 {\mu}K for the CO J = 10->9 transition at z = 6 and 10 respectively. If instead we adopt duty cycles of unity, the estimated CO(1-0) brightness temperature declines to < T_{CO}>~ 0.6 {\mu}K at z = 6 and ~0.03 {\mu}K at z =10 respectively; the correspondingly reduced signal strengths of the higher J lines make detection of these transitions at high significance less likely in the f_{UV} = f_{duty} = 1 model.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.