Quantitative inference of the $H_2$ column densities from 3 mm molecular emission: A case study towards Orion B

AI-generated keywords: Molecular hydrogen column densities Orion B Cold molecular clouds Multi-molecule line emission Supervised machine learning methods

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on accurately measuring molecular hydrogen (H2) column densities in cold molecular clouds
  • Team explores using multi-molecule line emission from radio observations to infer NH2
  • Supervised machine learning methods, specifically Random Forests, used on wide-field hyperspectral IRAM-30m observations of Orion B
  • Results show predictor for NH2 can predict within a factor of 1.2 from Herschel-based estimates for conditions similar to those in Orion B
  • Key molecular lines such as $^{13}$CO(1-0), $^{12}$CO(1-0), C$^{18}$O(1-0), and HCO$^+$(1-0) play significant roles in predicting NH2
  • Incorporating N$_2$H$^+$(1-0) and CH$_3$OH(20-10) lines improves predictions for dense core conditions
  • Research presents a promising approach to directly infer important physical parameters from millimeter domain molecular line emissions
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Pierre Gratier, Jérôme Pety, Emeric Bron, Antoine Roueff, Jan H. Orkisz, Maryvonne Gerin, Victor de Souza Magalhaes, Mathilde Gaudel, Maxime Vono, Sébastien Bardeau, Jocelyn Chanussot, Pierre Chainais, Javier R. Goicoechea, Viviana V. Guzmán, Annie Hughes, Jouni Kainulainen, David Languignon, Jacques Le Bourlot, Franck Le Petit, François Levrier, Harvey Liszt, Nicolas Peretto, Evelyne Roueff, Albrecht Sievers

A&A 645, A27 (2021)
arXiv: 2008.13417v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
Accepted for publication in A&A

Abstract: Molecular hydrogen being unobservable in cold molecular clouds, the column density measurements of molecular gas currently rely either on dust emission observation in the far-IR or on star counting. (Sub-)millimeter observations of numerous trace molecules are effective from ground based telescopes, but the relationships between the emission of one molecular line and the H2 column density (NH2) is non-linear and sensitive to excitation conditions, optical depths, abundance variations due to the underlying physico-chemistry. We aim to use multi-molecule line emission to infer NH2 from radio observations. We propose a data-driven approach to determine NH2 from radio molecular line observations. We use supervised machine learning methods (Random Forests) on wide-field hyperspectral IRAM-30m observations of the Orion B molecular cloud to train a predictor of NH2, using a limited set of molecular lines as input, and the Herschel-based dust-derived NH2 as ground truth output. For conditions similar to the Orion B molecular cloud, we obtain predictions of NH2 within a typical factor of 1.2 from the Herschel-based estimates. An analysis of the contributions of the different lines to the predictions show that the most important lines are $^{13}$CO(1-0), $^{12}$CO(1-0), C$^{18}$O(1-0), and HCO$^+$(1-0). A detailed analysis distinguishing between diffuse, translucent, filamentary, and dense core conditions show that the importance of these four lines depends on the regime, and that it is recommended to add the N$_2$H$^+$(1-0) and CH$_3$OH(20-10) lines for the prediction of NH2 in dense core conditions. This article opens a promising avenue to directly infer important physical parameters from the molecular line emission in the millimeter domain. The next step will be to try to infer several parameters simultaneously (e.g., NH2 and far-UV illumination field) to further test the method. [Abridged]

Submitted to arXiv on 31 Aug. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2008.13417v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study "Quantitative Inference of the $H_2$ Column Densities from 3 mm Molecular Emission: A Case Study towards Orion B," Pierre Gratier and a team of researchers tackle the challenge of accurately measuring molecular hydrogen (H2) column densities in cold molecular clouds. Currently, measurements rely on dust emission observation in the far-IR or star counting due to H2 being unobservable in these conditions. To address this limitation, the team explores the use of multi-molecule line emission from radio observations to infer NH2. Using supervised machine learning methods, specifically Random Forests, on wide-field hyperspectral IRAM-30m observations of the Orion B molecular cloud, they train a predictor for NH2. Their results show that by using a limited set of molecular lines as input and Herschel-based dust-derived NH2 as ground truth output, they are able to predict NH2 within a typical factor of 1.2 from the Herschel-based estimates for conditions similar to those in Orion B. The analysis also reveals that certain key molecular lines such as $^{13}$CO(1-0), $^{12}$CO(1-0), C$^{18}$O(1-0), and HCO$^+$(1-0) play significant roles in predicting NH2. Furthermore, when differentiating between diffuse, translucent, filamentary, and dense core conditions, incorporating N$_2$H$^+$(1-0) and CH$_3$OH(20-10) lines improves predictions for dense core conditions. Overall, this research presents a promising approach to directly infer important physical parameters from millimeter domain molecular line emissions. Moving forward, further testing is needed to simultaneously infer multiple parameters, such as NH2 and far-UV illumination field, to enhance the applicability and accuracy of this method in diverse astronomical contexts.
Created on 13 Jan. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.