The nature of the [CII] emission in dusty star-forming galaxies from the SPT-survey
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Study conducted [CII] observations of 20 strongly lensed dusty star-forming galaxies at redshifts 2.1 to 5.7 using APEX and Herschel telescopes
- Selection based on 1.4 mm flux (S_1.4mm > 20 mJy) from South Pole Telescope survey, with FIR luminosities determined through extensive photometric data analysis
- [CII] line robustly detected in 17 out of the 20 sources, with most being spectrally resolved; eleven sources also showed low-J CO detections from ATCA
- Consistent velocity profiles between [CII] and CO indicated minimal differential lensing effects between these species
- Combined [CII], low-J CO, and FIR data to constrain properties of interstellar medium within galaxies
- Found [CII] to CO(1-0) luminosity ratio in SPT sample of 5200 +- 1800, showing less scatter compared to other samples
- Line ratio best described by a medium with higher excitation temperature for [CII] than for CO, high CO optical depth (tau_CO >> 1), and low to moderate [CII] optical depth (tau_CII ~< 1), attributed to geometric structure of photodissociation regions within galaxies
Authors: Bitten Gullberg (ESO), Carlos De Breuck (ESO), Joaquin Vieira (Illinois), Axel Weiss (MPIfR), James Aguirre (University of Pennsylvania), Manuel Aravena (Universidad Diego Portales), Matthieu Béthermin (ESO), C. Matt Bradford (JPL), Matt Bothwell (Cambridge), John Carlstrom (Chicago), Scott Chapman (Dalhousie), Chris Fassnacht (Davis), Anthony Gonzalez (Florida), Thomas Greve (UCL), Yashar Hezavah (Stanford), William L. Holtzapfel (Berkeley), Kate Husband (Bristol), Jingzhe Ma (Florida), Matt Malkan (UCLA), Dan Marrone (Arizona), Karl Menten (MPIfR), Eric Murphy (IPAC), Chris Reichardt (Berkeley), Justin Spilker (Arizona), Anthony Stark (CfA), Maria Strandet (MPIfR), Niraj Welikala (Oxford)
Abstract: We present [CII] observations of 20 strongly lensed dusty star forming galaxies at 2.1 < z < 5.7 using APEX and Herschel. The sources were selected on their 1.4 mm flux (S_1.4mm > 20 mJy) from the South Pole Telescope survey, with far-infrared (FIR) luminosities determined from extensive photometric data. The [CII] line is robustly detected in 17 sources, all but one being spectrally resolved. Eleven out of 20 sources observed in [CII] also have low-J CO detections from ATCA. A comparison with mid- and high-J CO lines from ALMA reveals consistent [CII] and CO velocity profiles, suggesting that there is little differential lensing between these species. The [CII], low-J CO and FIR data allow us to constrain the properties of the interstellar medium. We find [CII] to CO(1-0) luminosity ratios in the SPT sample of 5200 +- 1800, with significantly less scatter than in other samples. This line ratio can be best described by a medium of [CII] and CO emitting gas with a higher [CII] than CO excitation temperature, high CO optical depth tau_CO >> 1, and low to moderate [CII] optical depth tau_CII ~< 1. The geometric structure of photodissociation regions allows for such conditions.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.