From hydrological laws to catchment models: A process-based model matches deep-learning accuracy on three continents
Auteurs : Xilin Xia
Résumé scientifique
Dooge asked whether hydrology has laws at the catchment scale. We ask whether a low-dimensional system built under physical laws can match the accuracy of neural networks that outperform process-based models on the same inputs. Three laws constrain a lumped catchment model. Conservation makes it a flux-connected storage network, dissipation fixes the sign of every flux and aggregation determines how the unresolved composition enters the fluxes, through effective laws over threshold distributions and a memory of the forcing. These laws admit four kinds of refinement. A parsimonious model under them, CaRT (11 parameters per catchment), is refined in a loop assisted by AI agents. Each refinement addresses an observed deficit through a hypothesis from the literature. The result, CaRT+, has fourteen states, 35 parameters per catchment and no daily neural network. Most refinements follow from aggregation over thresholds or from variables that carry no water but modulate fluxes. On 602 British and 593 US gauged catchments, single CaRT+ models reach median Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies of 0.863 and 0.765 in held-out years. A stateful LSTM reaches 0.869 and 0.751 and an entity-aware LSTM 0.862 and 0.754, while three-seed LSTM ensembles remain ahead of the CaRT+ ensemble by 0.003-0.012 in median paired NSE. On 505 drier Australian gauged catchments unused in development, single CaRT+ models reach 0.778 against 0.762 and 0.753 for the two LSTMs. The results suggest that catchment-scale laws exist as laws of form, with the constitutive families shared and only their parameters learned.
Les articles autour de lui, par date et par proximité
Plus haut, c’est plus proche de cet article ; à gauche, c’est plus ancien. Les traits relient les articles proches entre eux : les groupes de traits sont des sous-thèmes. Sélectionnez un point pour voir pourquoi il est là. Retour au résumé de cet article
Les articles autour de celui-ci
Classés selon la proximité de leur titre et de leur résumé avec ceux de cet article. Sélectionnez-en pour les lire ensemble.
Les articles les plus proches
-
Effective catchment hydrologic representations are low-dimensional but interaction-dependentYuan-Heng Wang, Hoshin V. Gupta · 2026 · Pas encore résumé
Cette étude examine la dimension minimale et les interactions entre états nécessaires pour représenter les dynamiques hydrologiques des bassins avec des modèles conceptuels et neuronaux.
Résumé scientifique
Hydrologic models must reconcile predictive flexibility with physical interpretability, yet the complexity required to reproduce catchment dynamics remains uncertain. Here we compare conceptual hydrologic models and neural networks built from mass-conserving computational units across 513 catchments in the contiguous United States, varying state dimensionality and cross-state information sharing. Under likelihood-based selection, median testing-period Kling-Gupta efficiency skill score (KGEss) increases from 0.83 with one allowable state to 0.89 with two, but reaches only 0.90 with five. KGE-based selection shows similarly rapid saturation. Cross-state information sharing provides an additio…
-
Differentiable, Learnable, Regionalized Process‐Based Models With Multiphysical Outputs can Approach State‐Of‐The‐Art Hydrologic Prediction AccuracyD. Feng, Jiang-Tao Liu, K. Lawson et al. · 2022 · Water Resources Research · cité 274 fois · Pas encore résumé
Les modèles δ différentiables cherchent aussi à approcher la précision des LSTM, mais produisent plusieurs variables hydrologiques grâce à une paramétrisation régionalisée.
Résumé scientifique
Predictions of hydrologic variables across the entire water cycle have significant value for water resources management as well as downstream applications such as ecosystem and water quality modeling. Recently, purely data‐driven deep learning models like long short‐term memory (LSTM) showed seemingly insurmountable performance in modeling rainfall runoff and other geoscientific variables, yet they cannot predict untrained physical variables and remain challenging to interpret. Here, we show that differentiable, learnable, process‐based models (called δ models here) can approach the performance level of LSTM for the intensively observed variable (streamflow) with regionalized parameterizatio…
-
Process-Aware AI for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: A Mass-Conserving Neural Framework with Hydrological Process ConstraintsM. Farmani, Hoshin V. Gupta, A. Behrangi et al. · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, non relu par les pairs · Pas encore résumé
Le cadre MCP impose la conservation dans un modèle neuronal de pluie-débit et ajoute progressivement des représentations de processus hydrologiques.
Résumé scientifique
Machine learning models can achieve high predictive accuracy in hydrological applications but often lack physical interpretability. The Mass-Conserving Perceptron (MCP) provides a physics-aware artificial intelligence (AI) framework that enforces conservation principles while allowing hydrological process relationships to be learned from data. In this study, we investigate how progressively embedding physically meaningful representations of hydrological processes within a single MCP storage unit improves predictive skill and interpretability in rainfall-runoff modeling. Starting from a minimal MCP formulation, we sequentially introduce bounded soil storage, state-dependent conductivity, vari…
-
When physics gets in the way: an entropy-based evaluation of conceptual constraints in hybrid hydrological modelsManuel Álvarez Chaves, Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Uwe Ehret et al. · 2026 · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · cité 2 fois · Pas encore résumé
Cette étude évalue par l’entropie les contraintes physiques des modèles hybrides, afin d’examiner leurs effets sur la précision et l’interprétabilité.
Résumé scientifique
Abstract. Merging physics-based with data-driven approaches in hybrid hydrological modeling offers new opportunities to enhance predictive accuracy while addressing challenges of model interpretability and fidelity. Traditional hydrological models, developed using physical principles, are easily interpretable but often limited by their rigidity and assumptions. In contrast, machine learning methods, such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, offer exceptional predictive performance but are often criticized for their black-box nature. Hybrid models aim to reconcile these approaches by imposing physics to constrain and understand what the ML part of the model does. This study introduces a…
-
Distributed Hydrological Modeling With Physics‐Encoded Deep Learning: A General Framework and Its Application in the AmazonChao Wang, Shi-Jie Jiang, Yi Zheng et al. · 2024 · Water Resources Research · cité 103 fois · Pas encore résumé
Ce cadre combine un modèle hydrologique distribué encodé en réseau neuronal, une paramétrisation par attributs de bassin et des substituts neuronaux de processus.
Résumé scientifique
While deep learning (DL) models exhibit superior simulation accuracy over traditional distributed hydrological models (DHMs), their main limitations lie in opacity and the absence of underlying physical mechanisms. The pursuit of synergies between DL and DHMs is an engaging research domain, yet a definitive roadmap remains elusive. In this study, a novel framework that seamlessly integrates a process‐based hydrological model encoded as a neural network (NN), an additional NN for mapping spatially distributed and physically meaningful parameters from watershed attributes, and NN‐based replacement models representing inadequately understood processes is developed. Multi‐source observations are…
-
Hydrological Concept Formation inside Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networksThomas Lees, S. Reece, Frederik Kratzert et al. · 2021 · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · cité 196 fois · Pas encore résumé
Cette étude cherche à interpréter les états internes des LSTM de pluie-débit et à déterminer s’ils représentent des concepts hydrologiques connus.
Résumé scientifique
Abstract. Neural networks have been shown to be extremely effective rainfall-runoff models, where the river discharge is predicted from meteorological inputs. However, the question remains, what have these models learned? Is it possible to extract information about the learned relationships that map inputs to outputs? And do these mappings represent known hydrological concepts? Small-scale experiments have demonstrated that the internal states of Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTMs), a particular neural network architecture predisposed to hydrological modelling, can be interpreted. By extracting the tensors which represent the learned translation from inputs (precipitation, temperature) t…
-
Rainfall-Runoff Simulation and Interpretation in Great Britain using LSTMsThomas Lees, M. Buechel, B. Anderson et al. · 2021 · Pas encore résumé
Cette étude compare les LSTM et l’EALSTM pour simuler les débits de bassins britanniques et interprète leurs états internes.
Résumé scientifique
<p>Techniques from the field of machine learning have shown considerable promise in rainfall-runoff modelling. This research offers three novel contributions to the advancement of this field: a study of the performance of LSTM based models in a GB hydrological context; a diagnosis of hydrological processes that data-driven models simulate well but conceptual models struggle with; and finally an exploration of methods for interpreting the internal cell states of the LSTMs. </p><p>In this study we train two deep learning models, a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) Network and an Entity Aware LSTM (EALSTM), to simulate discharge for 518 catchments across Great Britain using a newly published d…
-
The suitability of differentiable, physics-informed machine learning hydrologic models for ungauged regions and climate change impact assessmentD. Feng, H. Beck, K. Lawson et al. · 2023 · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · cité 178 fois · Pas encore résumé
Cette étude teste si des modèles δ régionalisés généralisent aux régions non jaugées et prédisent les tendances à long terme face aux LSTM.
Résumé scientifique
Abstract. As a genre of physics-informed machine learning, differentiable process-based hydrologic models (abbreviated as δ or delta models) with regionalized deep-network-based parameterization pipelines were recently shown to provide daily streamflow prediction performance closely approaching that of state-of-the-art long short-term memory (LSTM) deep networks. Meanwhile, δ models provide a full suite of diagnostic physical variables and guaranteed mass conservation. Here, we ran experiments to test (1) their ability to extrapolate to regions far from streamflow gauges and (2) their ability to make credible predictions of long-term (decadal-scale) change trends. We evaluated the models bas…
Aller plus loin
Comment ces articles sont-ils trouvés ?
Nous comparons le titre et le résumé de cet article avec ceux de tous les articles résumés sur ce site, et avec les articles que Semantic Scholar recommande, ceux qu’il cite et ceux qui le citent (pour un article très cité, ses citations les plus récentes et, depuis OpenAlex, les plus citées). Parmi les travaux antérieurs et les suites, les articles qui s’utilisent en profondeur, une méthode qu’il utilise et les suites très citées remontent un peu. Les niveaux (très proche, proche, apparenté) viennent de la similarité des textes, pas d’un jugement de qualité ; * signale un article sans résumé, comparé par son titre. La phrase sous un article est écrite par une IA à partir des deux résumés : vérifiez-la dans les articles. Un article jugé hors sujet par trois lecteurs quitte la liste.
Mis à jour le 9 novembre 2026.