CodeGen2: Lessons for Training LLMs on Programming and Natural Languages

Auteurs : Erik Nijkamp, Hiroaki Hayashi, Caiming Xiong, Silvio Savarese, Yingbo Zhou

Résumé : Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable abilities in representation learning for program synthesis and understanding tasks. The quality of the learned representations appears to be dictated by the neural scaling laws as a function of the number of model parameters and observations, while imposing upper bounds on the model performance by the amount of available data and compute, which is costly. In this study, we attempt to render the training of LLMs for program synthesis more efficient by unifying four key components: (1) model architectures, (2) learning methods, (3) infill sampling, and, (4) data distributions. Specifically, for the model architecture, we attempt to unify encoder and decoder-based models into a single prefix-LM. For learning methods, (i) causal language modeling, (ii) span corruption, (iii) infilling are unified into a simple learning algorithm. For infill sampling, we explore the claim of a "free lunch" hypothesis. For data distributions, the effect of a mixture distribution of programming and natural languages on model performance is explored. We conduct a comprehensive series of empirical experiments on 1B LLMs, for which failures and successes of this exploration are distilled into four lessons. We will provide a final recipe for training and release CodeGen2 models in size 1B, 3.7B, 7B, and, 16B parameters, along with the training framework as open-source: https://github.com/salesforce/CodeGen2.

Soumis à arXiv le 03 Mai. 2023

Explorez l'arbre d'article

Cliquez sur les nœuds de l'arborescence pour être redirigé vers un article donné et accéder à leurs résumés et assistant virtuel

Accédez également à nos Résumés, ou posez des questions sur cet article à notre Assistant IA.

Beta

Recherchez des articles similaires (en version bêta)

Nous comparons le titre et le résumé avec les articles indexés dans notre base. Pour les articles arXiv, la recherche porte sur la même catégorie ; pour les DOI et les autres sources, elle couvre toutes les sources et disciplines. Vous pouvez la relancer à mesure que notre base s’enrichit.