Exécution de notre outil de synthèse sur un nouvel article

Vérifiez l’article ci-dessous, puis lancez sa synthèse.


Psychometrics of rating scales for externalizing disorders in Japanese outpatients: The ADHD‐Rating Scale‐5 and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale

Saeko Ishibashi (University of Fukui, Tsuruga Nursing University), Takeshi Nishiyama (Nagoya City University), Takuya Makino (Kanazawa University, University of Fukui), Futoshi Suzuki (Kanazawa University, University of Fukui), Shoko Shimada (Kanazawa University, University of Fukui), Shinji Tomari (University of Fukui, University of Fukui Hospital), Eiji Imanari (University of Fukui, University of Fukui Hospital), Takuma Higashi (University of Fukui, University of Fukui Hospital), Shintaro Fukumoto (University of Fukui, University of Fukui Hospital), Sawa Kurata (Kanazawa University, University of Fukui), Yoshifumi Mizuno (Kanazawa University, University of Fukui), Takeshi Morimoto (Kanazawa University, University of Fukui), Hidetaka Nakamichi, Tomoko Iida (Niigata Prefectural Shibata Hospital), Kei Ohashi (Nagoya City University), Atsurou Yamada (Nagoya City University), Takuma Kimura, Yukiko Kuru (Chuo University), Satoshi Sumi (Kinjo Gakuin University), Yasuo Tanaka, Kazuya Ono (St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Hironobu Ichikawa, George J. DuPaul (Lehigh University), Hirotaka Kosaka (Kanazawa University, University of Fukui)

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Licence : CC BY-NC-ND

Résumé : OBJECTIVES: This study validated the Japanese version of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale. We extended the ADHD-RS-5 by adding the oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder subscales to compare the two rating scales psychometrically. METHODS: We examined the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion validity of the two rating scales in 135 Japanese outpatients aged 6-18 years. RESULTS: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good for all the subscales of the two rating scales except for the conduct disorder subscale of the ADHD-RS-5 extended. Good construct validity was revealed by expected correlational patterns between subscales from the two rating scales and the Children Behavior Checklist. The criterion validity was good for all the subscales of the two rating scales rated by parents, while teacher-ratings revealed substantially lower predictive ability for all the subscales. Agreement between parent- and teacher-ratings of the two rating scales was generally moderate and using predictive ratings alone of both ratings showed the best predictive ability among the integration methods examined. CONCLUSION: The two rating scales have sound psychometric properties and will aid in screening and severity assessment of externalizing disorders in Japanese clinical settings.

Publié le 16 Fév. 2024