Has the dust clump in the debris disk of Beta Pictoris moved?

Authors: Yinuo Han, Mark C. Wyatt, William R. F. Dent

MNRAS 519(3), 3257-3270 (2023)
arXiv: 2301.06891v1 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
14 pages, 8 figures, 5 tables. Published in MNRAS
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The edge-on debris disk of the nearby young star Beta Pictoris shows an unusual brightness asymmetry in the form of a clump. The clump has been detected in both the mid-IR and CO and its origin has so far remained uncertain. Here we present new mid-IR observations of Beta Pic to track any motion of the dust clump. Together with previous observations, the data span a period of 12 years. We measured any projected displacement of the dust clump over the 12-yr period to be $0.2^{+1.3}_{-1.4}$ au away from the star based on the median and 1$\sigma$ uncertainty, and constrain this displacement to be <11 au at the 3$\sigma$ level. This implies that the observed motion is incompatible with Keplerian motion at the 2.8$\sigma$ level. It has been posited that a planet migrating outwards may trap planetesimals into a 2:1 resonance, resulting in the observed clump at pericentre of their orbits that trails the planet. The observed motion is also incompatible with such resonant motion at the 2.6$\sigma$ level. While Keplerian motion and resonant motion is still possible, the data suggest that the dust clump is more likely stationary. Such a stationary dust clump could originate from the collision or tidal disruption of a planet-sized body, or from secular perturbations due to a planet that create regions with enhanced densities in the disk.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Jan. 2023

Explore the paper tree

Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant

Also access our AI generated Summaries, or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.