Has the dust clump in the debris disk of Beta Pictoris moved?

AI-generated keywords: Beta Pictoris Dust Clump Resonant Motion Keplerian Motion Mid-Infrared Observations

AI-generated Key Points

  • Beta Pictoris star system has an edge-on debris disk with an unusual brightness asymmetry in the form of a dust clump
  • Two theories proposed to explain the origin of the clump: planet migration trapping planetesimals into resonance or collision/tidal disruption of a planet-sized body
  • Li et al. (2012) measured displacement of the dust clump over 12 years and found it to be $0.2^{+1.3}_{-1.4}$ au away from the star based on median and 1$\sigma$ uncertainty, with constraints on this displacement being <11 au at the 3$\sigma$ level
  • Keplerian motion and resonant motion are both incompatible with observed motion at 2.8$\sigma$ and 2.6$\sigma$, respectively
  • New mid-infrared observations using VLT/VISIR in September 2015 suggest that although Keplerian motion and resonant motion are still possible explanations for the observed dust clump's origin, it is more likely stationary than moving significantly away from its original position relative to Beta Pictoris' star system center point.
  • Continued observations are important to better understand behavior of dust clump in Beta Pictoris' debris disk.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yinuo Han, Mark C. Wyatt, William R. F. Dent

MNRAS 519(3), 3257-3270 (2023)
arXiv: 2301.06891v1 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
14 pages, 8 figures, 5 tables. Published in MNRAS
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The edge-on debris disk of the nearby young star Beta Pictoris shows an unusual brightness asymmetry in the form of a clump. The clump has been detected in both the mid-IR and CO and its origin has so far remained uncertain. Here we present new mid-IR observations of Beta Pic to track any motion of the dust clump. Together with previous observations, the data span a period of 12 years. We measured any projected displacement of the dust clump over the 12-yr period to be $0.2^{+1.3}_{-1.4}$ au away from the star based on the median and 1$\sigma$ uncertainty, and constrain this displacement to be <11 au at the 3$\sigma$ level. This implies that the observed motion is incompatible with Keplerian motion at the 2.8$\sigma$ level. It has been posited that a planet migrating outwards may trap planetesimals into a 2:1 resonance, resulting in the observed clump at pericentre of their orbits that trails the planet. The observed motion is also incompatible with such resonant motion at the 2.6$\sigma$ level. While Keplerian motion and resonant motion is still possible, the data suggest that the dust clump is more likely stationary. Such a stationary dust clump could originate from the collision or tidal disruption of a planet-sized body, or from secular perturbations due to a planet that create regions with enhanced densities in the disk.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Jan. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.06891v1

The Beta Pictoris star system is known for its edge-on debris disk, which displays an unusual brightness asymmetry in the form of a dust clump. The origin of this clump has remained uncertain, with two classes of theories proposed to explain it. One theory suggests that a planet migrating outwards may trap planetesimals into a 2:1 resonance, resulting in the observed clump at pericentre of their orbits that trails the planet. The other theory suggests that the dust clump could originate from the collision or tidal disruption of a planet-sized body, or from secular perturbations due to a planet that create regions with enhanced densities in the disk. To discern between these two theories, Li et al. (2012) measured any projected displacement of the dust clump over a 12-year period and found it to be $0.2^{+1.3}_{-1.4}$ au away from the star based on median and 1$\sigma$ uncertainty, with constraints on this displacement being <11 au at the 3$\sigma$ level. This implies that Keplerian motion and resonant motion are both incompatible with the observed motion at 2.8$\sigma$ and 2.6$\sigma$, respectively. To obtain more robust constraints on any proper motion, new mid-infrared observations were conducted using VLT/VISIR in September 2015 to compare with previous observations made using T-ReCS camera on Gemini South Telescope. The B11.7 filter was used as it had consistent wavelength coverage with Si5 filter used previously and data reduction procedures were carried out consistently across all observations to ensure sub-pixel level precision required to track any small motion of the dust clump as expected by Li et al.(2012). Results from these new observations suggest that although Keplerian motion and resonant motion are still possible explanations for the observed dust clump's origin, they suggest that it is more likely stationary than moving significantly away from its original position relative to Beta Pictoris' star system center point.. Overall, this study provides further insight into the origin of the dust clump in Beta Pictoris' debris disk and highlights the importance of continued observations to better understand its behavior.
Created on 20 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.