Crosslinks increase the elastic modulus and fracture toughness of gelatin hydrogels
Authors: Anshul Shrivastava, Namrata Gundiah
Abstract: Hydrogels have the ability to undergo large deformations and yet fail like brittle materials. The development of biocompatible hydrogels with high strength and toughness is an ongoing challenge in many applications. We crosslinked bovine gelatin using glutaraldehyde (control) and methylglyoxal (MGO) and assessed changes in their fracture toughness. Swelling experiments show ~710% retention of water in MGO hydrogels as compared to ~450% in control specimens. We used FTIR to identify the presence of chemical groups that may be involved in the crosslinking of gelatin gels. Scanning electron micrographs of lyophilized MGO hydrogels show large pores with plate-like intact walls that help retain water as compared to control specimens. Monotonic compression tests demonstrate nonlinear stress-strain behaviors for both hydrogel groups. MGO samples had 96% higher moduli as compared to control hydrogels that had moduli of 4.77+-0.73 kPa (n=4). A first order Ogden model fit the stress-strain data well as compared to Mooney-Rivlin and neo-Hookean models. We used cavitation rheology to quantify the maximum pressure for bubble failure in the hydrogels using blunt needles with inner radii of 75, 150, 230, and 320 {\mu}m respectively. Pressures inside the bubbles increased linearly with time and dropped sharply following a critical value. Bubbles in MGO gels were small and penny-shaped as compared to large spherical bubbles in control samples. We used the critical pressures to quantify the fracture energies of the hydrogels. MGO treatment increased the fracture energy by 187% from 13.09 J/m2 for control gels. Finally, we discuss the challenges in using the Ogden and Mooney-Rivlin models to compute the failure energy for gelatin hydrogels.
Explore the paper tree
Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.