Crosslinks increase the elastic modulus and fracture toughness of gelatin hydrogels
AI-generated Key Points
- Hydrogels often fail like brittle materials
- Developing hydrogels with high strength and toughness is a challenge
- Researchers crosslinked bovine gelatin using glutaraldehyde (control) and methylglyoxal (MGO)
- MGO treatment significantly increased water retention in the hydrogels
- MGO hydrogels retained approximately 710% of water, while control specimens retained only about 450%
- FTIR was used to identify chemical groups involved in the crosslinking process
- Scanning electron micrographs showed large pores with plate-like intact walls in MGO hydrogels, aiding water retention
- Monotonic compression tests showed nonlinear stress-strain behaviors for both types of hydrogel groups
- MGO samples had a 96% higher modulus compared to control hydrogels
- Cavitation rheology was used to measure maximum pressure for bubble failure in the hydrogels
- Bubbles in MGO gels were smaller and penny-shaped compared to large spherical bubbles in control samples
- Fracture energy increased by 187% when control gels were treated with MGO
- Challenges related to using different models (Ogden and Mooney-Rivlin) to compute failure energy for gelatin hydrogels were discussed
Authors: Anshul Shrivastava, Namrata Gundiah
Abstract: Hydrogels have the ability to undergo large deformations and yet fail like brittle materials. The development of biocompatible hydrogels with high strength and toughness is an ongoing challenge in many applications. We crosslinked bovine gelatin using glutaraldehyde (control) and methylglyoxal (MGO) and assessed changes in their fracture toughness. Swelling experiments show ~710% retention of water in MGO hydrogels as compared to ~450% in control specimens. We used FTIR to identify the presence of chemical groups that may be involved in the crosslinking of gelatin gels. Scanning electron micrographs of lyophilized MGO hydrogels show large pores with plate-like intact walls that help retain water as compared to control specimens. Monotonic compression tests demonstrate nonlinear stress-strain behaviors for both hydrogel groups. MGO samples had 96% higher moduli as compared to control hydrogels that had moduli of 4.77+-0.73 kPa (n=4). A first order Ogden model fit the stress-strain data well as compared to Mooney-Rivlin and neo-Hookean models. We used cavitation rheology to quantify the maximum pressure for bubble failure in the hydrogels using blunt needles with inner radii of 75, 150, 230, and 320 {\mu}m respectively. Pressures inside the bubbles increased linearly with time and dropped sharply following a critical value. Bubbles in MGO gels were small and penny-shaped as compared to large spherical bubbles in control samples. We used the critical pressures to quantify the fracture energies of the hydrogels. MGO treatment increased the fracture energy by 187% from 13.09 J/m2 for control gels. Finally, we discuss the challenges in using the Ogden and Mooney-Rivlin models to compute the failure energy for gelatin hydrogels.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.