Search Results for « Online Knapsack »

The online knapsack problem is a classic online resource allocation problem in networking and operations research. Its basic version studies how to pack online arriving items of different sizes and values into a capacity-limited knapsack. In this paper, we study a general version that includes item departures, while also considering multiple knapsacks and multi-dimensional item sizes. We design a threshold-based online algorithm and prove that the algorithm can achieve order-optimal competitive ratios. Beyond worst-case performance guarantees, we also aim to achieve near-optimal average performance under typical instances. Towards this goal, we propose a data-driven online algorithm that learns within a policy-class that guarantees a worst-case performance bound. In trace-driven experiments, we show that our data-driven algorithm outperforms other benchmark algorithms in an application of online knapsack to job scheduling for cloud computing.

We investigate the online variant of the (Multiple) Knapsack Problem: an algorithm is to pack items, of arbitrary sizes and profits, in k knapsacks (bins) without exceeding the capacity of any bin. We study two objective functions: the sum and the maximum of profits over all bins. With either objective, our problem statement captures and generalizes previously studied problems, e.g. Dual Bin Packing [ 1 , 6 ] in case of the sum and Removable Knapsack [ 10 , 11 ] in case of the maximum. Following previous studies, we consider two variants, depending on whether the algorithm is allowed to remove items (forever) from its bins or not, and two special cases where the profit of an item is a function of its size, in addition to the general setting. We study both deterministic and randomized algorithms; for the latter, we consider both the oblivious and the adaptive adversary model. We classify each variant as either admitting O (1)-competitive algorithms or not. We develop simple O (1)-competitive algorithms for some cases of the max-objective variant believed to be intrac because only 1-bin deterministic algorithms were considered before.

We analyze the competitive ratio and the advice complexity of the online unbounded knapsack problem. An instance is given as a sequence of n items with a size and a value each, and an algorithm has to decide how often to pack each item into a knapsack of bounded capacity. The items are given online and the total size of the packed items must not exceed the knapsack's capacity, while the objective is to maximize the total value of the packed items. While each item can only be packed once in the classical 0-1 knapsack problem, the unbounded version allows for items to be packed multiple times. We show that the simple unbounded knapsack problem, where the size of each item is equal to its value, allows for a competitive ratio of 2. We also analyze randomized algorithms and show that, in contrast to the 0-1 knapsack problem, one uniformly random bit cannot improve an algorithm's performance. More randomness lowers the competitive ratio to less than 1.736, but it can never be below 1.693. In the advice complexity setting, we measure how many bits of information the algorithm has to know to achieve some desired solution quality. For the simple unbounded knapsack problem, one advice bit lowers the competitive ratio to 3/2. While this cannot be improved with fewer than log(n) advice bits for instances of length n, a competitive ratio of 1+epsilon can be achieved with O(log(n/epsilon)/epsilon) advice bits for any epsilon>0. We further show that no amount of advice bounded by a function f(n) allows an algorithm to be optimal. We also study the online general unbounded knapsack problem and show that it does not allow for any bounded competitive ratio for deterministic and randomized algorithms, as well as for algorithms using fewer than log(n) advice bits. We also provide an algorithm that uses O(log(n/epsilon)/epsilon) advice bits to achieve a competitive ratio of 1+epsilon for any epsilon>0.

In the knapsack problem, we are given a knapsack of some capacity and a set of items, each with a size and a value. The goal is to pack a selection of these items fitting the knapsack that maximizes the total value. The online version of this problem reveals the items one by one. For each item, the algorithm must decide immediately whether to pack it or not. We consider a natural variant of this problem, coined removable online knapsack. It differs from the classical variant by allowing the removal of packed items. Repacking is impossible, however: Once an item is removed, it is gone for good. We analyze the advice complexity of this problem. It measures how many advice bits an omniscient oracle needs to provide for an online algorithm to reach any given competitive ratio, which is, understood in its strict sense, just the approximation factor. We show that the competitive ratio jumps from unbounded without advice to near-optimal with just constantly many advice bits, a behavior unique among all problems examined so far. We also examine algorithms with barely any advice, for example just a single bit, and analyze the special case of the proportional knapsack problem, where an item's size always equals its value. We show that advice algorithms have various concrete applications and that lower bounds on the advice complexity of any problem are exceptionally strong. Our results improve some of the best known lower bounds on the competitive ratio for randomized algorithms and even for deterministic deterministic algorithms in established models such as knapsack with a resource buffer and various problems with multiple knapsacks. The seminal paper introducing knapsack with removability proposed such a problem for which we can even establish a one-to-one correspondence with the advice model; this paper therefore also provides a comprehensive analysis for this neglected problem.

In the online simple knapsack problem items are presented in an iterative fashion and an algorithm has to decide for each item whether to reject or permanently include it into the knapsack without any knowledge about the rest of the instance. The goal is to pack the knapsack as full as possible. In this work, we introduce the option of reserving items for the cost of a fixed fraction $α$ of their size. An algorithm may pay this fraction in order to postpone its decision on whether to include or reject these items until after the last item of the instance was presented. While the classical online simple knapsack problem does not admit any constantly bounded competitive ratio in the deterministic setting, we find that adding the possibility of reservation makes the problem constantly competitive. We give tight bounds for the whole range of $α$ from $0$ to $1$.

We introduce the Online Unbounded Knapsack Problem with Removal, a variation of the well-known Online Knapsack Problem. Items, each with a weight and value, arrive online and an algorithm must decide on whether or not to pack them into a knapsack with a fixed weight limit. An item may be packed an arbitrary number of times and items may be removed from the knapsack at any time without cost. The goal is to maximize the total value of items packed, while respecting the weight limit. We show that this is one of the very few natural online knapsack variants that allow for competitive deterministic algorithms in the general setting, by providing an algorithm with competitivity approximately 1.691. We complement this with a matching lower bound. We also analyze the proportional setting, where the weight and value of any single item agree, and show that deterministic algorithms can be exactly 3/2-competitive. Lastly, we give lower and upper bounds of 6/5 and 4/3 on the competitivity of randomized algorithms in this setting.