AI summary · arXiv: 2303.03378v1 · cs.LG

PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model

Danny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Corey Lynch, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Brian Ichter, Ayzaan Wahid, Jonathan Tompson,

and 14 more authorsQuan Vuong, Tianhe Yu, Wenlong Huang, Yevgen Chebotar, Pierre Sermanet, Daniel Duckworth, Sergey Levine, Vincent Vanhoucke, Karol Hausman, Marc Toussaint, Klaus Greff, Andy Zeng, Igor Mordatch, Pete Florence

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 06 Mar. 2023 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • The PaLM-E model is an embodied multimodal language model designed for grounding in robotics problems.
  • The model incorporates real-world continuous sensor modalities into language models, establishing a direct link between words and percepts.
  • The input to the model consists of multi-modal sentences that interleave visual, continuous state estimation, and textual input encodings.
  • PaLM-E can address various embodied reasoning tasks from different observation modalities on multiple embodiments.
  • Positive transfer is exhibited by the model through diverse joint training across internet-scale language, vision, and visual-language domains.
  • The largest PaLM-E-562B with 562B parameters is not only trained on robotics tasks but also a visual-language generalist with state-of-the-art performance on OK-VQA while retaining generalist language capabilities with increasing scale.
  • Embodied language models could enable general inference in the real world for robotics problems by incorporating real-world sensor data directly into natural language processing systems.
  • This approach has several potential benefits over traditional approaches to grounding in robotics problems, including more efficient use of resources and better integration between perception and action planning systems.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: PaLM-E Robotics Embodied Multimodal Language

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The PaLM-E model is an embodied multimodal language model designed to address the challenge of grounding in robotics problems. The model incorporates real-world continuous sensor modalities into language models, establishing a direct link between words and percepts. The input to the model consists of multi-modal sentences that interleave visual, continuous state estimation, and textual input encodings. These encodings are trained end-to-end with a pre-trained large language model for multiple embodied tasks such as sequential robotic manipulation planning, visual question answering, and captioning. The evaluations show that PaLM-E can address various embodied reasoning tasks from different observation modalities on multiple embodiments. Additionally, the model exhibits positive transfer by benefiting from diverse joint training across internet-scale language, vision, and visual-language domains. The largest PaLM-E-562B with 562B parameters is not only trained on robotics tasks but also a visual-language generalist with state-of-the-art performance on OK-VQA while retaining generalist language capabilities with increasing scale. The authors of this paper propose that their embodied language models could enable general inference in the real world for robotics problems by incorporating real-world sensor data directly into natural language processing systems. This approach has several potential benefits over traditional approaches to grounding in robotics problems, including more efficient use of resources and better integration between perception and action planning systems. Overall, the PaLM-E model represents an exciting development in the field of natural language processing and robotics research. By integrating real world sensor data into natural language processing systems, this approach has the potential to enable more robust and effective communication between humans and robots in a wide range of contexts.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.