AI summary · arXiv: 1812.03074v1 · cs.DS

Fixed-Parameter Algorithms for the Weighted Max-Cut Problem on Embedded 1-Planar Graphs

Christine Dahn, Nils M. Kriege, Petra Mutzel, Julian Schilling

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 29 Nov. 2018 This work is an extension of the conference version arXiv:1803.10983 , currently under review at TCS License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

The essentials

  • The paper proposes two fixed-parameter tractable algorithms to solve the weighted Max-Cut problem on embedded 1-planar graphs.
  • A graph is considered 1-planar if it can be drawn in the plane with at most one crossing per edge.
  • The proposed algorithms are parameterized by the crossing number k of the given embedding and recursively reduce a 1-planar graph to at most 3^k planar graphs using edge removal and node contraction techniques.
  • Their main algorithm then solves the Max-Cut problem for these planar graphs using FCE-MaxCut, which was introduced by Liers and Pardella [21].
  • In case of non-negative edge weights, they suggest a variant that allows solving planar instances with any planar Max-Cut algorithm.
  • The authors demonstrate that a maximum cut in a given 1-planar graph can be derived from solutions for its corresponding planar graphs.
  • Their algorithms compute a maximum cut in an embedded weighted 1-planar graph with n nodes and k edge crossings in time O(3^kn^{3/2} log n).
  • This work is an extension of their conference version (available as arXiv:1803.10983), which is currently under review at TCS.
  • The proposed algorithms have significant implications for real world applications such as network design and optimization problems where finding a maximum cut in a graph is crucial.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Weighted Max-Cut Problem

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper titled "Fixed-Parameter Algorithms for the Weighted Max-Cut Problem on Embedded 1-Planar Graphs," Christine Dahn, Nils M. Kriege, Petra Mutzel, and Julian Schilling propose two fixed-parameter tractable algorithms to solve the weighted Max-Cut problem on embedded 1-planar graphs. A graph is considered 1-planar if it can be drawn in the plane with at most one crossing per edge. The proposed algorithms are parameterized by the crossing number k of the given embedding and recursively reduce a 1-planar graph to at most 3^k planar graphs using edge removal and node contraction techniques. Their main algorithm then solves the Max-Cut problem for these planar graphs using FCE-MaxCut, which was introduced by Liers and Pardella [21]. In case of non-negative edge weights, they suggest a variant that allows solving planar instances with any planar Max-Cut algorithm. The authors demonstrate that a maximum cut in a given 1-planar graph can be derived from solutions for its corresponding planar graphs. Their algorithms compute a maximum cut in an embedded weighted 1-planar graph with n nodes and k edge crossings in time O(3^kn^{3/2} log n). This work is an extension of their conference version (available as arXiv:1803.10983), which is currently under review at TCS. The proposed algorithms have significant implications for real world applications such as network design and optimization problems where finding a maximum cut in a graph is crucial.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.