Learning-focuses in physics simulation learning situations

AI-generated keywords: Simulations Physics Education Learning Experiences Phenomenography Interactions

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The report is titled "Learning-focuses in Physics Simulation Learning Situations"
  • It presents findings of a qualitative study on students' learning experiences with computer simulations in physics education
  • The study involved supplementing traditional lectures with a physics computer simulation session
  • Phenomenography was used as the analytical framework to analyze students' learning focuses
  • Four distinct categories emerged from their interactions with the simulations
  • These categories were examined in terms of level of interaction, nature of physics knowledge and views of learning experienced by the students
  • Advantages and disadvantages of using simulations for learning purposes were identified based on the results
  • The report provides valuable insights into how students engage with computer simulations in physics education
  • It can inform future efforts to enhance teaching and learning practices in this field.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ake Ingerman, Cedric Linder, Delia Marshall

arXiv: physics/0401053v1 - DOI (physics.ed-ph)
6 pages, presented at the 12th SAARMSTE conference, Cape Town

Abstract: This is a report on a qualitative study of students' learning where a physics computer simulation session is used to supplement lectures on the topic. Drawing on phenomenography as the analytical framework, the students' learning-focuses were analysed. The result is a description of four distinctly different learning-focuses that emerged when the students involved in the study interacted with the computer simulations. These learning-focuses were then analysed in terms of the level of interaction, the nature of physics knowledge and views of learning experienced by the students. These results were then used to identify advantages and disadvantages of learning through interaction with simulations.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Jan. 2004

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: physics/0401053v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their report titled "Learning-focuses in Physics Simulation Learning Situations," Ake Ingerman, Cedric Linder and Delia Marshall present the findings of a qualitative study on students' learning experiences with computer simulations in physics education. The study involved supplementing traditional lectures on the topic with a physics computer simulation session. Drawing on phenomenography as the analytical framework, the authors analyzed the students' learning-focuses and identified four distinct categories that emerged from their interactions with the simulations. These categories were further examined in terms of level of interaction, nature of physics knowledge and views of learning experienced by the students. Based on these results, advantages and disadvantages of using simulations for learning purposes were identified. This report provides valuable insights into how students engage with computer simulations in physics education and can inform future efforts to enhance teaching and learning practices in this field.
Created on 25 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.