Nuclear matrix elements of double beta decay from beta decay

AI-generated keywords: Nuclear matrix elements double beta decay proton-neutron quasiparticle random-phase approximation particle-particle interaction parameter single beta decay

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study by Jouni Suhonen explores evaluation of nuclear matrix elements (NME) for $2νββ$ and $0νββ$ decay using pnQRPA.
  • Focus on determining proton-neutron particle-particle interaction parameter, $g_{\rm pp}$.
  • Results suggest relying solely on experimental half-life of $2νββ$ decay for $g_{\rm pp}$ can be misleading.
  • Advocates for using data from single beta decay as a more reliable approach.
  • Research highlights complexities in determining NMEs in double beta decays and importance of considering alternative sources of information.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jouni Suhonen

Phys.Lett. B607 (2005) 87-95
14 pages, 3 figures

Abstract: The evaluation of the nuclear matrix elements (NME) of the two-neutrino double beta ($2νββ$) decay and neutrinoless double beta ($0νββ$) decay using the proton-neutron quasiparticle random-phase approximation (pnQRPA) is addressed. In particular, the extraction of a proper value of the proton-neutron particle-particle interaction parameter, $g_{\rm pp}$, of this theory is analyzed in detail. Evidence is shown, that it can be misleading to use the experimental half-life of the $2νββ$ decay to extract a value for $g_{\rm pp}$. Rather, arguments are given in favour of using the available data on single beta decay for this purpose.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Dec. 2004

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: nucl-th/0412064v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study by Jouni Suhonen, the evaluation of nuclear matrix elements (NME) for two-neutrino double beta ($2νββ$) decay and neutrinoless double beta ($0νββ$) decay is explored using the proton-neutron quasiparticle random-phase approximation (pnQRPA). The focus lies on determining the proton-neutron particle-particle interaction parameter, $g_{\rm pp}$, within this framework. The results show that relying solely on the experimental half-life of $2νββ$ decay to extract a value for $g_{\rm pp}$ can be misleading. Instead, the study advocates for utilizing data from single beta decay as a more reliable approach. This research highlights the complexities involved in accurately determining NMEs in double beta decays and emphasizes the importance of considering alternative sources of information to refine theoretical models in nuclear physics.
Created on 16 Nov. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.