Scheduling Algorithms for Procrastinators
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper presents scheduling algorithms for procrastinators, where the speed of executing a job increases as the due date approaches.
- Optimal off-line scheduling policies are provided for linearly increasing speed functions and computational/numerical issues involved in implementing this policy are explained.
- The online setting is explored and it is shown that there exist adversaries that force any online scheduling policy to miss due dates.
- The problem of minimizing the maximum interval stretch of any job is introduced, which is defined as the job's flow time divided by the difference between its due date and release time.
- Several common scheduling strategies have arbitrarily large maximum interval stretches, including "hit-the-highest-nail" strategy beloved by procrastinators.
- A new scheduling policy called "thrashing" is introduced and proved to be a $\Theta(1)$ approximation algorithm for minimizing the maximum interval stretch.
- This paper provides valuable insights into how to effectively schedule tasks for procrastinators while highlighting some of the challenges associated with doing so in an online setting.
- The authors' findings have important implications for individuals who struggle with procrastination as well as organizations seeking to optimize their operations through efficient task scheduling.
Authors: Michael A. Bender, Raphael Clifford, Kostas Tsichlas
Abstract: This paper presents scheduling algorithms for procrastinators, where the speed that a procrastinator executes a job increases as the due date approaches. We give optimal off-line scheduling policies for linearly increasing speed functions. We then explain the computational/numerical issues involved in implementing this policy. We next explore the online setting, showing that there exist adversaries that force any online scheduling policy to miss due dates. This impossibility result motivates the problem of minimizing the maximum interval stretch of any job; the interval stretch of a job is the job's flow time divided by the job's due date minus release time. We show that several common scheduling strategies, including the "hit-the-highest-nail" strategy beloved by procrastinators, have arbitrarily large maximum interval stretch. Then we give the "thrashing" scheduling policy and show that it is a \Theta(1) approximation algorithm for the maximum interval stretch.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.