The environments forming stellar and planetary systems

Authors: Michael Kuffmeier, Jaime E. Pineda, Peter Schilke, Jes K. Jørgensen, Korash Assani, Alain Baudry, Maite Beltrán, Eleonora Bianchi, Claudio Codella, Laura Colzi, Audrey Coutens, Timea Csengeri, Maria Drozdovskaya, Vardan Elbakyan, Francesco Fontani, Gary Fuller, Josep Miquel Girart, Katharine Johnston, Pamela Klaassen, Rolf Kuiper, Sébastien Maret, Nagayoshi Ohashi, Linda Podio, Víctor M. Rivilla, Giovanni Sabatini, Patricio Sanhueza, Dominique Segura-Cox, Kei Tanaka, Maxime Tanious, Fengwei Xu, Yao-Lun Yang, Qizhou Zhang

arXiv: 2610.22462v1 - DOI (astro-ph.IM)
10 pages + 1 page affiliations, 1 figure, ALMA2040 whitepaper
License: CC BY 4.0
AI-generated keywords: Star formation Protoplanetary disks Environmental effects Accretion ALMA2040

AI-generated Key Points

  • Purpose: The ALMA2040 white paper examines how stellar birth environments shape the mass, angular momentum, and chemistry of disks, influencing planets, brown dwarfs, and stellar companions.
  • Environmental diversity: Isolated, solar-metallicity disks are an incomplete basis for planet-formation models; clustered environments and varying metallicity alter radiation, dynamics, cooling, chemistry, and available solids.
  • Evidence base: The paper synthesizes existing observations and theory and proposes future telescope capabilities; it does not present a new survey, simulation, or demonstrated discoveries.
  • Observational strategy: Trace material from molecular clouds through infalling streamers into disks, accretion flows, and outflows using matched-resolution molecular-line, continuum, polarization, and multi-epoch observations.
  • Mass delivery: Apparent inflow does not establish how much mass reaches a disk; streamer accretion estimates have uncertainties of up to an order of magnitude.
  • Chemistry: Connecting reservoirs roughly 1,000–5,000 au across to disk-impact regions a few au across could reveal whether incoming material preserves or transforms its chemical inventory.
  • Angular momentum: Approximately 1 au resolution would help measure wind launching and compare angular momentum entering disks, remaining within them, and escaping through outflows.
  • Proposed upgrades: ALMA2040 requires approximately tenfold improvements in spectral-line and continuum sensitivity and threefold longer baselines, potentially enabling observations 100 times faster and samples of hundreds of objects.
  • Technical requirements: Targets include resolution better than 5 milliarcseconds, velocity channels no wider than about 0.1 km/s, brightness-temperature noise near 1 K, and instantaneous bandwidth of at least 128 GHz, ideally 512 GHz.
  • Reach and limits: A more ambitious 1-milliarcsecond resolution would probe approximately 50 au in the Magellanic Clouds, distinguishing massive protostellar disks but not their inner planet-forming regions.
  • Conclusion: Sensitivity and resolution must improve together; comparisons across approximately 0.2–1 times solar metallicity also require extended-emission recovery and chemical and dynamical modeling.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: How does a star's birth environment set the mass, angular momentum and chemical complexity delivered to its planet-forming disk, and thereby whether it builds planets, brown dwarfs or stellar companions? This requires following material from the cloud to the sub-au to few-au scales where infalling gas, magnetized winds and the disk interact, across all star-forming environments. At frequencies where young disks are optically thin, current facilities, even ALMA after its Wideband Sensitivity Upgrade, fall short by a factor of a few in angular resolution and an order of magnitude in sensitivity. Likewise, resolving how disks around distant high-mass stars fragment into tight multiples requires a linear resolution of a few to a few tens of au, currently out of reach. Yet the disks characterized so far lie almost exclusively in nearby, isolated clouds at near-solar metallicity, although the environment (radiation field, ionization rate, gas and stellar density, pressure and metallicity) varies by orders of magnitude across the Galaxy. Most stars, probably including the Sun, form in clustered regions at kpc distances, and the widest metallicity range lies farther still, in the outer Galaxy, the Central Molecular Zone and the Magellanic Clouds. With three times finer angular resolution and ten times the sensitivity, ALMA2040 will follow the path of material from cloud to disk across the full stellar-mass spectrum and, for the first time, measure how this path changes with environment: resolving the sub-au infall-impact and wind-launching zones nearby, disk fragmentation and the onset of multiplicity in distant high-mass regions, and disk formation at a few tenths of solar metallicity. It will thereby reveal the dust-obscured, embedded origins of planetary systems that optical and infrared facilities, including the ELT, see only once they emerge, and show how the birth environment shapes them.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Oct. 2026

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2610.22462v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This scientific white paper for ALMA2040 examines how a star’s birth environment determines the mass, angular momentum, and chemical inventory delivered to its planet-forming disk, and how these conditions influence the formation of planets, brown dwarfs, and stellar companions. The authors argue that nearby, relatively isolated disks with solar metallicity provide an incomplete foundation for planet-formation models. Most stars likely form in clusters, where radiation, stellar encounters, pressure, and ionization can differ substantially from conditions in isolated regions. Metallicity adds further variation by affecting dust abundance, cooling, chemistry, and the supply of solid material available for planet formation. Rather than presenting a new observational survey or simulation, the paper synthesizes existing observations and theoretical research, identifies unresolved physical processes, and translates the measurements needed to investigate them into telescope requirements. Its proposed strategy traces material from molecular-cloud structures through infalling streamers into disks, and subsequently through accretion and outflows. Matched-resolution observations of faint molecular lines, dust continuum emission, and polarization, combined with observations at multiple epochs, would characterize density, temperature, velocity, chemical composition, and variability across stellar masses and environments. A central challenge is that detecting an apparent inflow does not establish how much mass it delivers. Existing estimates of streamer accretion rates depend on assumed molecular abundances, excitation temperatures, and three-dimensional trajectories, resulting in uncertainties of up to an order of magnitude. The authors propose linking reservoirs extending roughly 1,000–5,000 astronomical units (au) to disk-impact regions only a few au across. Chemical diagnostics, including deuterated molecules, shock tracers, and complex organic species, could reveal whether incoming material retains its inherited composition or undergoes chemical transformation during accretion. Angular-momentum removal remains another major uncertainty. Current observations resolve disk winds down to approximately 10 au in fewer than ten nearby systems, making wind-launching radii and mass-loading rates difficult to determine. Resolution of approximately 1 au would help distinguish wind streamlines and compare the angular momentum entering through infall, remaining in the disk, and escaping through outflows. Any imbalance would constrain the contributions required from magnetic stresses, gravitational structures, or companions. Longer-wavelength observations would also probe disk mass obscured by optical depth, while rapid-response monitoring could help distinguish possible triggers of accretion bursts. The paper’s principal quantitative outcomes are proposed capabilities, not demonstrated results. ALMA2040 would require approximately tenfold improvements in both spectral-line and continuum sensitivity relative to current ALMA capabilities, together with threefold longer baselines. The sensitivity improvement would enable observations roughly 100 times faster at a fixed noise level, potentially expanding samples from a handful of objects to hundreds. Angular resolution better than 5 milliarcseconds would probe sub-au scales in nearby systems and approximately 10–25 au at distances of 2–5 kiloparsecs. A more ambitious goal of 1 milliarcsecond would reach approximately 50 au in the Magellanic Clouds. Additional requirements include velocity channels no wider than about 0.1 kilometres per second, brightness-temperature noise near 1 kelvin, and instantaneous bandwidth of at least 128 gigahertz, ideally reaching 512 gigahertz through simultaneous multiband observations. The authors conclude that sensitivity and resolution must improve together to connect environmental conditions with disk evolution, fragmentation, and emerging system architectures. Comparisons spanning approximately 0.2–1 times solar metallicity would test whether environmental differences affect disk assembly as well as subsequent evolution. However, the proposed discoveries depend on future instrumentation, adequate recovery of extended emission, and interpretation informed by chemical and dynamical models. Even the most ambitious resolution would distinguish massive protostellar disks in the Magellanic Clouds without resolving their inner planet-forming regions.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.