The SRG/eROSITA diffuse soft X-ray background II. spectra and morphology of the eROSITA bubbles in the western Galactic hemisphere
AI-generated Key Points
- The eROSITA bubbles (eROb) were discovered in 2020 during the SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey, standing out as large structures in the X-ray sky.
- Researchers aim to explore the bubbles further using eROSITA all-sky maps and spatially resolved spectra to understand their three-dimensional structure and hot gas properties.
- Analysis of high-quality spectra revealed two emission components within the western eRObub with different temperatures and emission measures.
- Gas properties suggest sub-solar abundances for the eRObub, consistent with Galactic halo expectations, while the North Polar Spur shows higher abundances possibly indicating a distinct origin.
- A cool shell surrounds the northern eRObub with an apparent temperature under collisional ionization equilibrium assumptions.
- Both eRObub have well-constrained horizontal sizes but uncertain vertical extents due to limitations in observing X-ray emissions.
- The study sheds light on physical properties of eROSITA bubbles, addressing questions about their geometry, emitting material characteristics, energetics for inflation, and implications for related structures like the North Polar Spur and Fermi Bubbles within our Galaxy.
Authors: Michael C. H. Yeung, Martin G. F. Mayer, Andy Strong, Michael J. Freyberg, Gabriele Ponti, Konrad Dennerl, Junjie Mao, Manami Sasaki, Xueying Zheng, Jeremy S. Sanders, Yi Zhang, Jiejia Liu, Liyi Gu, Werner Becker, Frank Haberl, Teng Liu, Andrea Merloni, Peter Predehl
Abstract: The eROSITA bubbles (eRObub) were discovered in 2020 in the first SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey, and are among the most extended structures in the X-ray sky. Using eROSITA all-sky maps and spatially resolved spectra, we aim to infer the three-dimensional structure and measure the hot gas properties of the eRObub. We fit spectra binned to a constant S/N and high-S/N spectra from custom regions to examine gas properties in more detail. We fit the morphology of eRObub with a parametrised geometrical model that describes a blast wave propagating into an idealised Galactic halo from the centre. We found the interior of the western eRObub is best characterised by two emission components with relatively uniform temperatures: a hotter component at $kT=0.60\pm0.02$ keV, and a colder one at $kT=0.21^{+0.03}_{-0.01}$ keV, where the latter's emission measure is about five times higher on average. Our spectra suggest sub-solar abundances ($Z=0.2\pm0.1 Z_\odot$), consistent with expectations for the Galactic halo, while we find no conclusive evidence for $α$-element enhancement. In contrast, the North Polar Spur exhibits higher abundances ($Z>0.5 Z_\odot$), which, at face value, disfavours a common origin. We spectrally confirm an apparent cool shell at $kT\sim0.18$-$0.2$ keV surrounding the northern eRObub, assuming collisional ionisation equilibrium. We found no noticeable difference in X-ray emission in regions overlapping with the Fermi Bubbles. Our geometrical model suggests that the horizontal size of both eRObub is well-constrained (semi-minor axis $\sim 6$ kpc), but their vertical extent is uncertain, as the observed X-ray emission is almost insensitive to the existence and location of a bubble cap. Additionally, a tilt ($\sim 30^{\circ}$) towards $l\sim 220^{\circ}$ is needed to reproduce the projected image of the northern eRObub, whereas the southern bubble requires little tilt.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.