Generalised Symmetries and Swampland-Type Constraints from Charge Quantisation via Rational Homotopy Theory

Summaries already available in other languages: fr

Authors: Luigi Alfonsi, Hyungrok Kim, William G. A. Luciani

42 pages

Abstract: Sati and Schreiber [arXiv:2402.18473, arXiv:2512.12431] have proposed that charge quantisation in quantum field theory and string theory is governed by a homotopy type $\mathcal A$. We provide a refinement of this postulate, incorporating other currents including matter, connecting it to adjustments in higher gauge theory and providing a prescription for determining $\mathcal A$, and show that, while the homotopy groups of $\mathcal A$ classify the possible brane charges, the homology groups of $\mathcal A$ classify the invertible higher-form symmetries. Furthermore, we show that the charge-quantisation postulate implies a number of non-trivial constraints on quantum field theories similar to those implied by swampland conjectures; in particular, it rules out noncompact gauge groups and one-form field strengths that form a non-nilpotent Lie algebra. Finally, we argue that for theories of quantum gravity the space $\mathcal A$ must be contractible, in accordance with the swampland conjectures on the absence of global generalised symmetries and the completeness of the spectrum of charges, and explain how this explicitly arises in the case of Type I string theory.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Apr. 2026

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2604.22656v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 27 Apr. 2026
Available in other languages: fr

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.