Fluid Intelligence: A Forward Look on AI Foundation Models in Computational Fluid Dynamics
AI-generated Key Points
- The field of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is rapidly evolving thanks to advancements in GPUs and AI.
- Authors Neil Ashton, Johannes Brandstetter, and Siddhartha Mishra bridge the gap between machine learning and CFD communities by breaking down industrial-scale simulations into core components.
- Their main contribution is a groundbreaking scaling law that integrates CFD inputs for data generation and model training.
- The scaling law sheds light on the challenges of developing next-generation AI models for complex fluid dynamics problems.
- Authors provide quantitative estimates for large-scale limit scenarios where data generation costs dominate total compute versus cases where model training costs prevail.
- Incorporating high-fidelity transient data offers the most effective path towards establishing a foundation model.
- Concrete numbers are provided as the first public estimates on computational cost and time required to build such a foundation model for CFD.
- In their forward-looking perspective titled "Fluid Intelligence: A Forward Look on AI Foundation Models in Computational Fluid Dynamics," authors delve deeper into optimizing specific models for better results in tackling complex fluid dynamics problems.
Authors: Neil Ashton, Johannes Brandstetter, Siddhartha Mishra
Abstract: Driven by the advancement of GPUs and AI, the field of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is undergoing significant transformations. This paper bridges the gap between the machine learning and CFD communities by deconstructing industrial-scale CFD simulations into their core components. Our main contribution is to propose the first scaling law that incorporates CFD inputs for both data generation and model training to outline the unique challenges of developing and deploying these next-generation AI models for complex fluid dynamics problems. Using our new scaling law, we establish quantitative estimates for the large-scale limit, distinguishing between regimes where the cost of data generation is the dominant factor in total compute versus where the cost of model training prevails. We conclude that the incorporation of high-fidelity transient data provides the optimum route to a foundation model. We constrain our theory with concrete numbers, providing the first public estimates on the computational cost and time to build a foundation model for CFD.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.